2008 has been a rather fruitful year for me. As this point of time, STI has declined by around 49% since the beginning of 2008 while my holdings of equities is currently slightly up by 4%. This is because I stayed out of the market for most of the time and I only entered near the interim bottom formed in October and since then, STI has rebounded slightly although it is in a consolidation phase now.
I'm not sure what 2009 will bring. Whether the bottom made in October will turn out to be the final bottom for the STI or it will continue to plunge, I'm not that sure either. What I'm sure is that if it plunge even more, I will be ready to scoop up more equities at a cheaper price.
As I recalled on how I made my purchases in equities, I guess some part of it can be attributed to luck although proper planning is still important. When the market peaked in October in 2007, my plan was to split my capital into 3 portions. I will then use each portion of the capital to buy in when STI has declined 30%, 50% and 60% from its peak respectively. This will help to average down my buying price and reduce the risk of putting all my capital into equities, only to see the market plunging even further.
As it turns out, when STI declined 30% from the peak, I was rather hesitant about buying in because I reasoned that a decline of 30% from the peak is rather low for a financial crisis that has been compared with the Great Depression. After all, the STI actually declined by slightly more than 60% in the Asian Financial Crisis thus I gave it a miss in buying when STI declined 30% from the peak.
Not long after, STI declined 50% from its peak and this time round, I was fearful of buying. Irrationally, I thought that since STI has declined by such a huge percentage, it can continue to plunge even further. On hindsight, this way of thinking is rather illogical. I should be thinking that since STI has declined 50% from its peak, it is the time to buy since equities are at huge discount now. However, I gave it a miss again once again and I still think it is foolish of me to do so since I could be running the risk of the market rebounding off the bottom without me.
Finally, STI declined by 60% from its peak. This time round, I was too tempted by the huge undervaluation of equities and I plonked part of my capital in promptly. It turns out that STI has found an interim bottom at a level which is slightly more than 60% from its peak.
Thus I was pretty fortunate that my holdings are still slightly positive at this point of time. If the market continues to plunge further, I will continue to scoop up more equities. I guess it is important to plan and know what to do when the market reaches there and continue to stick to your plans. In this way, one will feel less fearful and will be able to carry out his plan successfully. Let's hope that 2009 will turn out to be a better year for all of us.
Wednesday, December 31
Tuesday, December 30
How to make money in 2009
Posted by
Kay
at
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
2 comments
In this article, there were also other interviews being conducted but I find that the viewpoint being shared by Gabriel Yap is very informative and I am holding the same views as him too. To summarize the important things that he said,
1. Upside is capped by consistent bad news from the economy, earnings and asset markets, but the downside is protected by already excessive pessimism and historically low valuations.
2. A good indication that the smart money is back can be indicated by the market volume.
3. Equities will bottom first before the economy, then will come companies' earnings and lastly, the property market.
Part of the article, How to make money in 2009 which was published in the Sunday Times on the 28 December 2008.
Mr Gabriel Yap, senior dealing director with DMG & Partners Securities
What was the best and worst thing that happened to you financially this year ?
Best: My decision to liquidate practically all my trading portfolio when the market saw two price peaks in October2007 and broke its trend line after the second one - a strong indication that it was time to sell - in December 2007.
Worst: Despite liquidating almost all of my trading portfolio, I had only begun to trim my investment portfolio in August 2008 when the banks were reporting huge losses despite management’s assurances of a turnaround.
How do you see 2009 panning out?
Equities are on course for their largest losses since the Great Depression and 2009 could exhibit the classic post-boom and bust sideways trading pattern in the first half of the year. That is when the upside is capped by consistent bad news from the economy, earnings and asset markets, but the downside is protected by already excessive pessimism and historically low valuations.
We will likely see a decline in global credit spreads which have already happened, bottoming of companies earnings and a stop in the decline of United States housing prices.
What is one piece of financial advice you would give to a person looking ahead in 2009?
Based on fundamentals, the 60 to 70per cent collapse in global equities since October2007 has brought valuations to 40per cent below replacement values of their underlying assets. Thus, the downside, if any, from the current levels will be minimal.
Look for the market's daily trading volume to rise. At the peak we were trading 9.4 billion shares a day but right now we are seeing less than a billion a day. If you see volume moving up to three or four billion, that's a very good indication that some of the smart money is coming back.
Would your answer be different for a)a single, working person b)a married couple with school-going children c)a retiree?
a) You should be looking to increase your risk profile in equities.
b) Same, but less weightage in stocks highly sensitive to economic factors.
c) Invest or trade with only your spare cash. Keep the bulk of your portfolio in the steady income generation class.
Is it a good time to buy a car or property?
Car and certificate of entitlement (COE) prices move in tandem with the economy, so it is not too timely to do so if it is not necessary.
Based on experience, property will be the last asset class to recover this time round, in view of the looming supply.
As with the past great equity bottoms of the Singapore market in 1985, 1998 and 2002, equities will bottom first before the economy, then will come companies' earnings and lastly, the property market.
In this article, there were also other interviews being conducted but I find that the viewpoint being shared by Gabriel Yap is very informative and I am holding the same views as him too. To summarize the important things that he said,
1. Upside is capped by consistent bad news from the economy, earnings and asset markets, but the downside is protected by already excessive pessimism and historically low valuations.
2. A good indication that the smart money is back can be indicated by the market volume.
3. Equities will bottom first before the economy, then will come companies' earnings and lastly, the property market.
Monday, December 29
Singapore's private home sales, prices & rents fall sharply in Q4
Posted by
Kay
at
Monday, December 29, 2008
1 comment
Singapore's private home sales, prices & rents fall sharply in Q4
By Timothy Ouyang, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 29 December 2008 1447 hrs
SINGAPORE: Private home sales in Singapore have taken a sharp fall in the fourth quarter of this year.
According to a report released Monday by property consultant DTZ, only 112 private homes were sold in the primary market in October, and 192 units sold in November.
This, compared to the monthly average of 444 units sold in the first nine months of the year.
The October sales volume is the lowest since the release of official monthly sales data by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) in June 2007.
For the full year, DTZ estimated that the number of home sales in the primary and secondary markets will only make up about 35 per cent of last year's sales, which saw some 38,100 units sold.
The figure is based on caveats lodged with the URA so far.
At the same time, the fall in private home prices have started to gather pace in the fourth quarter, with prime non-landed properties the hardest hit.
Prices of non-landed freehold private homes in the prime districts fell by 14 per cent quarter-on-quarter in the three months ended December, according to DTZ Research.
Overall, average private home prices have fallen 21.6 per cent year-on-year to S$1,160 per square feet, below the level of S$1,200 per sq ft in the second quarter of 2007.
Meanwhile, average monthly rents of prime non-landed homes have fallen 9.2 per cent to S$4.36 per square feet.
DTZ expects home sales to remain low next year as the recession takes its toll and homebuyers are concerned over job security.
- CNA/yb
Labels:
Property
Sunday, December 28
Preference Shares
Posted by
Kay
at
Sunday, December 28, 2008
1 comment
Preference shares, also known as preferred stocks can be said to be a mixture between debts and equity. The reason why they are known as preference shares as compared to ordinary shares, also known as common stock is because the preference shareholders are given preference over ordinary shareholders over some issues as given below.
1. Dividends
Dividends must be paid to the preference shareholders first before they can be paid to the ordinary shareholders.
2. Liquidation
In the event that the company is liquidated, the proceeds from the liquidation will be distributed to the preference shareholders first before it is being distributed to the ordinary shareholders. However, the depositors and the creditors of the company will be paid first before the preference shareholders.
3. Voting rights
In exchange for the above privileges, preference shareholders do not have any voting rights as compared with ordinary shareholders.
Unlike bonds or debts, the company issuing the preference shares has no obligations although it may have the right to purchase back or redeem the preference shares although it may have the right to redeem it back at a later period. Thus preference shares will not mature unless the company redeems it back.
The above mentioned features applies to all preference shares generally. There are some issues that separate different preference shares from one another.
1. Cumulative or non-cumulative
In the event that the company do not declare and pay any dividends for a particular financial year, the dividends that is supposed to be paid this financial year will be accumulated to the next financial year only if the preference shares are cumulative. If the preference shares are non-cumulative, the dividends that were not declared and not paid in the previous financial year will not be accumulated to the next financial year.
For example, you are holding 1 share of a OCBC cumulative preference shares that gives 5% dividend on a par value of $1000. For the year 2000, OCBC is supposed to pay you a dividend of 5% x $1000 = $50. However, OCBC decides not to give out the dividend for the year 2000. Now let's move on to the next year. For the year 2001, OCBC is supposed to pay you a dividend of 5% x $1000 = $50 again and OCBC decides to give out dividends for this year. However, remember that OCBC did not give out dividends in 2000. Since the shares are cumulative, they will have to pay out the dividends which they did not pay you in 2000 along with the dividends for 2001, thus you will receive a total of $100 in dividends. If the shares are non-cumulative, you will only receive a total of $50 since they will not have to pay you the dividends which they did not pay in 2000.
2. Convertibility
If the preference shares are convertible, it means that you can convert the preference shares to ordinary shares at a certain price. The advantage of this for investors is that you will be able to convert the preference shares to ordinary shares for a profit if the price of the ordinary shares are high.
I am touching on some other considerations on preference shares and perhaps a case study of a preference share issued by a local bank in another post. You can access it here.
1. Dividends
Dividends must be paid to the preference shareholders first before they can be paid to the ordinary shareholders.
2. Liquidation
In the event that the company is liquidated, the proceeds from the liquidation will be distributed to the preference shareholders first before it is being distributed to the ordinary shareholders. However, the depositors and the creditors of the company will be paid first before the preference shareholders.
3. Voting rights
In exchange for the above privileges, preference shareholders do not have any voting rights as compared with ordinary shareholders.
Unlike bonds or debts, the company issuing the preference shares has no obligations although it may have the right to purchase back or redeem the preference shares although it may have the right to redeem it back at a later period. Thus preference shares will not mature unless the company redeems it back.
The above mentioned features applies to all preference shares generally. There are some issues that separate different preference shares from one another.
1. Cumulative or non-cumulative
In the event that the company do not declare and pay any dividends for a particular financial year, the dividends that is supposed to be paid this financial year will be accumulated to the next financial year only if the preference shares are cumulative. If the preference shares are non-cumulative, the dividends that were not declared and not paid in the previous financial year will not be accumulated to the next financial year.
For example, you are holding 1 share of a OCBC cumulative preference shares that gives 5% dividend on a par value of $1000. For the year 2000, OCBC is supposed to pay you a dividend of 5% x $1000 = $50. However, OCBC decides not to give out the dividend for the year 2000. Now let's move on to the next year. For the year 2001, OCBC is supposed to pay you a dividend of 5% x $1000 = $50 again and OCBC decides to give out dividends for this year. However, remember that OCBC did not give out dividends in 2000. Since the shares are cumulative, they will have to pay out the dividends which they did not pay you in 2000 along with the dividends for 2001, thus you will receive a total of $100 in dividends. If the shares are non-cumulative, you will only receive a total of $50 since they will not have to pay you the dividends which they did not pay in 2000.
2. Convertibility
If the preference shares are convertible, it means that you can convert the preference shares to ordinary shares at a certain price. The advantage of this for investors is that you will be able to convert the preference shares to ordinary shares for a profit if the price of the ordinary shares are high.
I am touching on some other considerations on preference shares and perhaps a case study of a preference share issued by a local bank in another post. You can access it here.
Labels:
Preference Shares
Saturday, December 27
Output in recession-hit Singapore down 7.5 pct in Nov
Posted by
Kay
at
Saturday, December 27, 2008
1 comment
SINGAPORE (AFP) — Singapore's manufacturing output fell 7.5 percent in November, according to the latest data, as exports from the recession-hit economy suffer during a global slowdown.
The 7.5-percent decline, compared with the same month last year, was less than an average 15.0 percent drop forecast in a Dow Jones Newswires poll of economists.
Gains in pharmaceutical production could not outweigh falls in most other categories, the preliminary data from Singapore's Economic Development Board (EDB) showed.
But increased biomedical manufacturing, which includes pharmaceuticals, pushed output up by 6.2 percent on a seasonally adjusted month-on-month basis in November from October, EDB said.
Singapore's manufacturing sector accounts for nearly a quarter of economic output. Virtually all of the production heads for foreign markets, an indicator of Singapore's dependence on the health of the global economy, analysts say.
With key markets the European Union and the United States in recession, Singapore's exports have been hurt and the city-state in October became the first Asian economy to enter recession.
The numbers were "a little better than people expected" but most gains came from the notoriously volatile pharmaceutical sector, said David Cohen, director of Asian forecasting at global research house Action Economics.
Pharmaceutical output grew 17.5 percent in November, the EDB said. Medical technology, the other component of biomedical manufacturing, dropped by 15.4 percent but overall biomedical output rose 14.9 percent, EDB said.
Consumer electronics and information-communications output fell by 58.2 percent while semiconductors dropped 17.6 percent, helping to drag total output in the electronics sector down by 19.4 percent last month, it said.
The chemical sector fell by 20.1 percent in November, on lower petrochemical and petroleum output, while precision engineering output fell by 19.1 percent and general manufacturing -- which includes printing -- declined by 1.7 percent, EDB said.
An increase in ship repairs and aerospace output boosted the transport engineering sector by 5.2 percent in November, the data showed.
Cohen said the economy is likely to grow less than the government forecast of 2.5 percent this year -- "maybe closer to two percent".
Next year, he added, growth should come in at the lower end of the government's 2009 projection, which ranges from a contraction of 1.0 percent to growth of 2.0 percent.
"I think the global demand is still slowing down, which is reflected in the electronics sector," he said, adding that advance fourth-quarter GDP figures due on January 2 are expected to provide further evidence that Singapore is in recession.
"The hope is it will bottom out by the middle of next year, which still seems reasonable," he said, adding that some downside risk remains.
Labels:
Economy
Friday, December 26
Minibonds cost my mum $100k
Posted by
Kay
at
Friday, December 26, 2008
1 comment
True enough, no one knows when the stock market will bottom or whether stocks will continue to plunge. Thus it is important not to buy everything at one go but spread out your entry points and buy more equities if it gets cheaper.
Minibonds cost my mum $100kOn the surface, the problem to the author seems to be "nobody knows where the bottom is, whether stock prices would plunge further." To me, it seems to me that the real problem is that the author is simply fearful of buying equities. So where do her fear comes from ? It comes from her losses made in equities when she sunk most of her available funds before the spectacular crash in August. If I am having 50% paper losses in my portfolio, I will definitely be afraid of buying equities at this point of time too even though logically, this is the best time to buy equities since it is so undervalued now. That is why it is important to know when to buy equities.
By Jessica Cheam
One night three months ago, when I was in Hong Kong on a work assignment, my mother rang me up.
'I lost $100,000 of my retirement savings,' she told me, her voice trembling.
My initial reaction was one of disbelief.
You're joking right, I asked her.
It's just paper loss, right?
Convinced that my mum was exaggerating her investment losses, I told her to wait for the economy to turn around.
No, it's gone, she insisted.
It turned out she was right.
The hefty sum she had invested in the now infamous Minibond notes, which she bought from ABN Amro Bank just a year ago, is now as good as worthless, sucked into this void called the financial crisis whose magnitude seems to be growing by the day.
When I first heard the news, a flurry of questions ran through my mind: Why weren't you more careful, didn't you read the terms and conditions, didn't you realise the risks involved? I interrogated her.
After all, the $100,000 was the result of decades of blood, sweat and tears. It was money painstakingly saved for her retirement from her job as a factory worker, slogging her way up to senior manager.
I felt sick to my stomach that I was powerless to prevent that money from vanishing from the face of the Earth, and that my mum, who's 52, had to postpone her retirement for a few years - all due to Wall Street's reckless ways.
She had meant to put the $100,000 in a fixed deposit account but ABN Amro's sales staff convinced her that the Minibond notes were 'exactly like fixed depo-
sit' with a 5 per cent return, capital guaranteed. The rest is history.
But just a few months ago, whoever would have thought, much less my mum, that a 158-year-old institution like Lehman Brothers would collapse?
The day it filed for bankruptcy - Sept 15 - was also the day that symbolised the end of an era and the beginning of another: One of previously unimaginable uncertainty and volatility for investors, which makes investing now seem like a game of roulette.
These days, I've found myself asking questions such as: In these troubled times, where is our money safe? Is it worth investing at all? Where do you begin to look?
You might think putting it all in a bank and saving till the storm is over is the safest thing to do.
But even then, I know of people who felt their money was threatened when United States lending giant Citi ran into trouble last month. These people actually closed their Citi accounts and put their money in what they deemed were 'safer' local banks.
In such unpredictable times, it's anybody's guess which big financial institution is going to fail next - and whose money it will take with it.
Already, the recession is spreading and US automakers have just been saved from complete breakdown by a lifeline on Friday. So amid all this grim news, I contemplated what my next financial 'action plan' should be.
Should I just hibernate until the next upturn? Or venture like a brave soldier into the war zone that is the markets?
I know of a few courageous (or foolish) friends, who are riding on the volatility of equities, hoping to make a quick buck.
One has actually made a killing from repeatedly buying a property blue chip firm whenever it dips under $3, then selling it when it rebounds.
Even my mum, undeterred by her Minibond episode, seems determined to recoup her losses by dabbling in the market to earn a few thousand dollars here and there. 'At least I'm making my own choices now, and not giving it to someone to lose it for me,' she reasoned.
I had tragically sunk most of my available funds into equities before the spectacular crash in August and failed to join the stampede out of the market. The only comfort I take out of this is that I know I'm not alone.
I thought about the choices of an investor in the current climate: With stocks looking so cheap, the temptation is to average down our investments, or invest in blue chips that are looking very attractive.
The problem is, nobody knows where the bottom is, whether stock prices would plunge further.
This is exacerbated by the fact that confidence in credible companies is being shaken, the latest being Wall Street grandee Bernard Madoff, who will go down in history as 'the man who conned the world' in a US$50 billion (S$72 billion) scam.
Even if we buy blue chips today, are they really as infallible as they look?
As the financial crisis unfolds into a global economic one, even bets I had put on China and India funds - the only economies still growing, albeit at a much slower rate now - have been sliding in value.
So do I move them to safer funds? Or leave the money there?
So many questions and no easy answers. In my quest for some clarity, I turned to some financial experts for advice.
One of them told me that in these times, trying to make money in the next three to six months 'is very, very tough'.
If you need the money, keep it, he said. If there's any spare, the possibility of multiplying your money is there, but invest your money in batches - not all at once - and put it in quality companies.
For what is already invested, one needs to look at it fund by fund, stock by stock, relooking at the fundamentals.
If the stock is deteriorating, there's no guarantee it won't fall further - so get rid of it, at least you will get some money back.
If a company is backed by good fundamentals and a strong history of riding downturns, stick with it.
When things look up again - as they certainly will, it's a matter of when - you'll make your money back or at least break-even your investments, he added.
You could still consider government bonds, gold, fixed deposits and foreign currency investments.
The thing to remember, he said, is to assess your own risk appetite. You might want the returns, but can you take the risks?
I've asked myself this many times, and lately I've found my impulsive investing inclinations being tempered by something called practicality.
With home prices coming down, next year could be a good time to buy my first property - which brings me to the old adage, that investment is safest in 'bricks and mortar'.
I'm sure there are good investment bargains out there, whether in stocks, funds or in homes. The prudent thing, I've learnt, is to exercise the utmost caution and map out every worst-case scenario that could happen with any investments you make, and read all the fine print.
I wish I could turn back time and give the Minibond investment my mum had made the same circumspection.
But it's too late now.
It is a high price to pay, but an oversight both my mum - and I - will never make again.
This article was first published in The Straits Times on December 21, 2008.
True enough, no one knows when the stock market will bottom or whether stocks will continue to plunge. Thus it is important not to buy everything at one go but spread out your entry points and buy more equities if it gets cheaper.
Wednesday, December 24
DBS rights issue not for M&A
Posted by
Kay
at
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
4 comments
This must be the piece of news that the stock market is concerned with right now. DBS will be offering rights to purchase one share at $5.42 for every two shares that existing shareholders now. This would mean that they will have to fork out $5420 for that one lot due to the rights issue. If they do not subscribe to this right, their holdings of the counter would be diluted by 2/3 and that is quite large in my opinion.
Dec 22, 2008
Rights issue not for M&A
DBS Group Holdings, South-east Asia's biggest bank by assets, said on Monday it plans to raise about S$4 billion in a rights issue.
The funds will beef up the bank's balance sheet at a time when global investors favour financial institutions with higher capital levels, DBS said in a statement.
'DBS is initiating this capital-raising exercise from a position of strength,' chief executive officer Richard Stanley said in a statement.
'Our business continues to perform well despite the challenges of the global economic downturn.
'The rights issue will enable DBS to capture opportunities to entrench our market position in key Asian markets and confidently weather the economic uncertainties ahead.'
DBS said the capital to be raised from the rights issue is not meant for mergers and acquisitions (M&A) or extraordinary provisions.
Neither is it designed for a 'clean-up of our balance sheet,' Mr Stanley said during a conference call with the media.
'On the contrary, we are currently well-provisioned and it is not to fund any M&A activities,' he said.
Mr Stanley said he expects 2009 to be a challenging year with the global economy still hurting from financial turbulence that swept across the world this year.
'The real economy continues to be challenged for reasons that we all know.
It's no secret,' he said.
The global crisis has its roots in tainted mortgage-related assets linked to US financial institutions. Governments in the US and Europe were forced to step in and bail out their troubled banks.
DBS expects its provisions and non-performing loans to be 'up somewhat but we don't expect it to be a major spike', Mr Stanley said.
Analysts from Credit Suisse cited several possible reasons for the rights issue. They said the move could be intended to plug a potential fourth-quarter loss or to fund growth of Singapore dollar-denominated loans.
It that 'the fresh equity would allay a lot of market concerns and remove some of the discount' in relation to Singapore's other banks, UOB and OCBC.
DBS said in November that third-quarter net profit fell 38 per cent year-on-year to S$379 million as market-related income took a hit from the global financial crisis and bigger provisions.
Also last month, the bank said it was cutting 900 staff to trim costs during the credit crisis. DBS became the first major Singaporean firm to announce job cuts of such magnitude.
The bank will offer 760.48 million new ordinary shares at S$5.42 each on the basis of one rights share for every two shares held on Dec 31, said DBS.
The rights issue share price is a 45 per cent discount to the bank's closing stock price of $9.85 on Friday, it said.
Singapore investment firm Temasek Holdings, the largest shareholder in DBS with a 27.6 per cent holding, will subscribe for up to 33.3 per cent of the rights issue.
Temasek Holdings' stake in DBS will remain under 30 per cent even after taking up the rights issue, said Mr Stanley.
DBS is the largest of Singapore's three major banks and has operations in 16 markets including Hong Kong, China and Dubai.
In November Standard Chartered bank, which is listed in Hong Kong and London, said it plans to raise 1.78 billion pounds (S$3.84 billion) in a rights issue to better position itself during the global financial turmoil.
DBS shares ended down 48 cents at S$9.37 Singapore. -- AFP
This must be the piece of news that the stock market is concerned with right now. DBS will be offering rights to purchase one share at $5.42 for every two shares that existing shareholders now. This would mean that they will have to fork out $5420 for that one lot due to the rights issue. If they do not subscribe to this right, their holdings of the counter would be diluted by 2/3 and that is quite large in my opinion.
Saturday, December 20
Biosensors: An example of a BB trap
Posted by
Kay
at
Saturday, December 20, 2008
3 comments
A few weeks ago, I was chatting with Musicwhiz and others in La Papillion's chatbox on his website. We were talking about some of the counters in the past that were being speculated wildly by the market to sky high prices before plunging down again to a fraction of their peak price and how the marketmakers work in such a situation to profit from the market. Biosensors is one such counter which belongs to this category.
To start off with, what is a BB ? A BB stands for big boys and that is a term that is often used in the local stock market circles. It refers to those who have the funds to move the price of a counter and that include funds, syndicates of investors or any investors who has a significant amount of shares in this counter. Collectively, I will simply call them as the marketmaker.
So what kind of business is Biosensors involved in ? As taken from the SGX website, Biosensors develops, manufactures and commercialises innovative medical devices used in interventional cardiology and critical care procedures. Since 1990, Biosensors has manufactured and marketed critical care catheter systems and related devices that are used during heart surgery and intensive care treatment and monitoring. In the year 2000, the Group entered the interventional cardiology market with the introduction of their proprietary coronary bare-metal stent, along with stent delivery balloon catheter system, followed by an expansion of the product line to include angioplasty balloons and catheters.
The Group has internally developed technology to address each component of a drug-eluting stent system, including a stent,, a stent delivery catheter, a polymer and a proprietary drug. The Group is pursuing two drug-eluting stent programs independently, and has licensed aspects of its drug-eluting stent technology to four licensees.
A quick look at the financial statements reveal that Biosensors is not an attractive company at all to own from an investment point of view. It has been making losses year after year and in fact, this company has no retained earnings at all ! Cash flow from operating activities has been negative and most of the cash in Biosensors are being raised through financing activities such as the issue of convertible bonds. Futhermore, this company has no sustainable source of revenue from its operations and relies mainly from borrowing to finance the research and the operations of the company.
To start off with, what is a BB ? A BB stands for big boys and that is a term that is often used in the local stock market circles. It refers to those who have the funds to move the price of a counter and that include funds, syndicates of investors or any investors who has a significant amount of shares in this counter. Collectively, I will simply call them as the marketmaker.
So what kind of business is Biosensors involved in ? As taken from the SGX website, Biosensors develops, manufactures and commercialises innovative medical devices used in interventional cardiology and critical care procedures. Since 1990, Biosensors has manufactured and marketed critical care catheter systems and related devices that are used during heart surgery and intensive care treatment and monitoring. In the year 2000, the Group entered the interventional cardiology market with the introduction of their proprietary coronary bare-metal stent, along with stent delivery balloon catheter system, followed by an expansion of the product line to include angioplasty balloons and catheters.
The Group has internally developed technology to address each component of a drug-eluting stent system, including a stent,, a stent delivery catheter, a polymer and a proprietary drug. The Group is pursuing two drug-eluting stent programs independently, and has licensed aspects of its drug-eluting stent technology to four licensees.
A quick look at the financial statements reveal that Biosensors is not an attractive company at all to own from an investment point of view. It has been making losses year after year and in fact, this company has no retained earnings at all ! Cash flow from operating activities has been negative and most of the cash in Biosensors are being raised through financing activities such as the issue of convertible bonds. Futhermore, this company has no sustainable source of revenue from its operations and relies mainly from borrowing to finance the research and the operations of the company.
I noticed that this counter was under speculation during last year and saw how the marketmaker made use of news to profit from the market speculators. In general, the markemaker will accumulate this counter prior to the release of bullish news. At that point of time, the market would be waiting for news such as the Conformite Europeene (CE) mark approval, which is an international symbol for medical devices that adhere to strict quality assurance standards issued by the European Union. The CE mark approval is of significance because it must be obtained before the stents can be allowed to be sold in the European Union. Furthermore, the approval process for the other regions such as Asia are less difficult thus if the CE mark can be approved, it will help to pave the way for approval in other regions.
I have attached the chart for Biosensors. If you take a look at the chart, you will notice that there are regions of peaks and throughs. The movement can be summarized below;
1. Consolidation will take place with light volume and the sideway movement of the counter. This is the time where the marketmaker will buy this counter slowly and quietly at a low price in anticipation of the next rally. This is known as accumulation. Since the marketmaker will try to accumulate this counter at a low price, it cannot buy too much of this counter within a short period of time. Otherwise, the price of the counter will start to move up and the price will no longer be low enough for the marketmaker to purchase. Furthermore, it may also trigger off bullish speculation or rumours in the market, causing the price of the counter to increase.
2. Upon the release of bullish news, the marketmaker may try to buy this counter in large quantities to lure the market to buy more and push the share price up. Even though the marketmaker may buy in large quantities at this stage, the average buying price will still be rather low due to previous accumulation of this counter in the consolidation stage. This is the stage where the share price will rally and it can be seen by huge price movement of the counter coupled with heavy volume.
3. Once the share price reached its peak, the marketmaker will try to sell off this counter slowly to take profit. This is also known as distribution. It is done slowly to maintain the high share price in order to maximize their profits.
4. After the marketmaker have sold off this counter, the market will be left holding the counter. Since the markemaker is not buying the counter anymore, the price of this counter will start to plunge. Once the price is low enough, the marketmaker will start to accumulate this counter again and the whole cycle will be repeated again.
So what are some of the important lessons which I have learned from my observation of the movement of this counter ?
1. If one can identify that there is a marketmaker moving a counter, one can buy the counter during the accumulation phase and sell them off during the distribution phase. This is rather difficult to do as identifying the accumulation and distribution phases can be quite hard. In the case of Biosensors, this counter moves with a predictable pattern of peaks and troughs which coincides with the release of certain news thus it is quite easy to see what the marketmaker is doing.
2. One should always exit his position if the direction of the movement of the counter is not moving according to how one is expecting it to move. This is because if the marketmaker decides not to move this counter anymore, the price of this counter will simply plunge. If one continues to hold on to his position, it is likely that he will incur a huge loss. This is especially true when one is doing any speculation. One should always get out of a losing position when your opinion proves to be wrong.
I have attached the chart for Biosensors. If you take a look at the chart, you will notice that there are regions of peaks and throughs. The movement can be summarized below;
1. Consolidation will take place with light volume and the sideway movement of the counter. This is the time where the marketmaker will buy this counter slowly and quietly at a low price in anticipation of the next rally. This is known as accumulation. Since the marketmaker will try to accumulate this counter at a low price, it cannot buy too much of this counter within a short period of time. Otherwise, the price of the counter will start to move up and the price will no longer be low enough for the marketmaker to purchase. Furthermore, it may also trigger off bullish speculation or rumours in the market, causing the price of the counter to increase.
2. Upon the release of bullish news, the marketmaker may try to buy this counter in large quantities to lure the market to buy more and push the share price up. Even though the marketmaker may buy in large quantities at this stage, the average buying price will still be rather low due to previous accumulation of this counter in the consolidation stage. This is the stage where the share price will rally and it can be seen by huge price movement of the counter coupled with heavy volume.
3. Once the share price reached its peak, the marketmaker will try to sell off this counter slowly to take profit. This is also known as distribution. It is done slowly to maintain the high share price in order to maximize their profits.
4. After the marketmaker have sold off this counter, the market will be left holding the counter. Since the markemaker is not buying the counter anymore, the price of this counter will start to plunge. Once the price is low enough, the marketmaker will start to accumulate this counter again and the whole cycle will be repeated again.
So what are some of the important lessons which I have learned from my observation of the movement of this counter ?
1. If one can identify that there is a marketmaker moving a counter, one can buy the counter during the accumulation phase and sell them off during the distribution phase. This is rather difficult to do as identifying the accumulation and distribution phases can be quite hard. In the case of Biosensors, this counter moves with a predictable pattern of peaks and troughs which coincides with the release of certain news thus it is quite easy to see what the marketmaker is doing.
2. One should always exit his position if the direction of the movement of the counter is not moving according to how one is expecting it to move. This is because if the marketmaker decides not to move this counter anymore, the price of this counter will simply plunge. If one continues to hold on to his position, it is likely that he will incur a huge loss. This is especially true when one is doing any speculation. One should always get out of a losing position when your opinion proves to be wrong.
Labels:
Informational
Friday, December 19
Lowest Brokerage Fee
Posted by
Kay
at
Friday, December 19, 2008
28 comments
I have compiled a list of the brokerage fees offered by the local brokerages for buying local stocks and made a comparison of which brokerages is offering the cheapest brokerage fees based on the contract value.
For the minimum brokerage fees, Citibank has the lowest brokerage fee at $22. Otherwise, Saxo Capital seems to be offering the lowest brokerage fee at 0.18% of the contract value for any contract value below $100,000. However, you will need to put up a sum of $15,000 to open an account with them. For contract value above $100,000, Citibank, Lim & Tan and Philips are also offering a brokerage fee of 0.18% of the contract value.
Citibank
DBS Vickers
iOCBC
Kim Eng
Lim & Tan
Philips
Saxo Capital
UOB Kayhian
For the minimum brokerage fees, Citibank has the lowest brokerage fee at $22. Otherwise, Saxo Capital seems to be offering the lowest brokerage fee at 0.18% of the contract value for any contract value below $100,000. However, you will need to put up a sum of $15,000 to open an account with them. For contract value above $100,000, Citibank, Lim & Tan and Philips are also offering a brokerage fee of 0.18% of the contract value.
Citibank
DBS Vickers
iOCBC
Kim Eng
Lim & Tan
Philips
Saxo Capital
UOB Kayhian
Labels:
Useful
Smaller flats coming up
Posted by
Kay
at
Friday, December 19, 2008
1 comment
Smaller flats coming up
Supply over the next two years is a marked increase to meet demand
By Jessica Cheam
SMALLER flats are making a comeback, with the Housing Board (HDB) ramping up supply to around 4,000 over the next two years to meet surging demand.
It marks a dramatic turnaround for a style of flat that had not been been built for about 20 years.
Next year 2,000 three-room and smaller flats will be built, almost double the amount put up this year, with a further 2000 earmarked for 2010.
The HDB move will mean a steady supply of smaller flats for lower income families and homeowners who need to downgrade amid grimmer economic times.
National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan flagged the strategy in Parliament last month.
HDB deputy chief executive Tan Poh Hong said yesterday that the board has revived smaller flats on a large scale as 'there are are more people who will need to downgrade, as well as first-timer families who would also like to start with smaller flats to be financially prudent'.
Analysts anticipate a good take-up as 'difficult economic conditions' encourage homebuyers to 'start small'.
Buyers like nurse Liu Li, 29, a home-hunter on the look-out for such affordable flats, said: 'A bigger pool of new, small flats will widen choices for first-timers like me.'
Prices will start from as low as $76,000 for the new small units.
The HDB stopped building two- and three-roomers in the 1980s as growing families fuelled demand for bigger flats.
But they were re-introduced in 2004 and two years ago, the HDB said it would resume building two-roomers to meet increasing demand.
Demand for smaller flats has been red hot recently. HDB sales have attracted over 10 times more applicants than homes available. An October sale of 150 small flats was swamped with 2,426 applications in just a week.
Mr Kelvin Wang, who recently bought a three-roomer in Tiong Bahru, said he had difficulty finding the home, his first, because there were so few small ones around.
'The increased supply will help ease demand for such homes,' said the 24-year-old engineer.
Some of the new smaller flats form part of a new standard project launched by the HDB yesterday.
Dew Spring @ Yishun at the junction of Yishun Ring Road and Yishun Street 41 offers 504 four-room, 216 three-roomers and 144 two-room units.
The build-to-order (BTO) project has the largest number of smaller flat types among HDB's BTO launches this year. BTO projects are built only when a certain level of demand is reached.
HDB's Ms Tan stressed that the homes will be kept affordable.
Two-roomers at Dew Spring start at $76,000 to $90,000; three-roomers go for between $120,000 and $146,000 with four-roomers at $197,000 to $238,000.
For the first time, the HDB has released comparable prices of resale flats in the same area to show the affordability of the new flats being launched.
Prices of 20-year-old three-roomers nearby of similar size, for example, are selling for $175,000 to $180,000 - higher than the launch price, the HDB said.
PropNex chief executive Mohamed Ismail said that Dew Spring flats 'are priced very attractively. The smaller units are below $200 psf (per square foot), which is much lower than the median resale prices for that area in the last quarter'.
The HDB has launched 6,600 homes this year under its BTO scheme, of which 883, or 13 per cent, were two-room and three-room flats.
It plans to launch a further 1,180 units in the next two weeks, which will include 280 studio apartments, two-room and three-room homes.
jcheam@sph.com.sg
Labels:
Property
Thursday, December 18
Long-term property investors should bet on S’pore
Posted by
Kay
at
Thursday, December 18, 2008
1 comment
SINGAPORE looks a pretty good bet for long-term property investors, given its strong savings rate, low corporate taxes and near-full employment, according to a key real estate player here yesterday.Properties are definitely looking very attractive to purchase given the current economic turmoil. The property market tends to lag behind the stock market. If the current consolidation in the stock market is seen as a sign that the market has bottomed, it is likely that there is still some time to go before the property market will reach its bottom.
And if prices fall further next year, it would be a good time to buy, said Mr Christopher Fossick, Jones Lang LaSalle’s managing director for Singapore and South-east Asia at a media briefing at the firm’s office. There is a consensus that the economy will go through a tough time next year, which means it will be tough for everybody, including those in property, he said.
‘If prices are lower, that provides opportunities,’ Mr Fossick added. He pointed out that Asia, particularly Singapore, given its status as a financial services hub, is better off economically than the United States and Europe. The level of household borrowings and corporate loans here is lower than in the US and Britain, he said.
He quoted a recent report commissioned by London Mayor Boris Johnson that said that the rising status of regional hubs such as Dubai and Singapore is threatening London’s position as the world’s financial capital.
He listed some of the key factors that should continue to attract investors here. Singapore’s corporate tax rate of 18 per cent, he said, is a tad above Hong Kong’s 17 per cent but below the 29 per cent rate in Britain and the 40 per cent levy in the US.
There is near full employment and a strong savings culture here. Singapore has a gross national savings rate of 45 per cent, compared with 11 per cent in the US, 14 per cent in Britain and 32 per cent in Hong Kong. Also, about 76.5 per cent of Singapore’s population are working, compared with 67.1 per cent in the US and Britain.
Property is always a medium- to long-term proposition, he added. Most investors treat it as such and have an investment horizon of more than 24 months. Jones Lang LaSalle’s regional director and head of markets, Mr Chris Archibold, said the office market will have a lower take-up rate over the next year but most of the expected new supply will not come to market until late next year anyway.
There are a lot of institutional investors on the sidelines waiting to enter the Singapore market, according to Mr Fossick.
‘They are saying, come 2009 and 2010, there will be opportunities to buy properties in Singapore,’ he said. ‘Obviously, it’s going to be at some discount from prices we saw in 2007.’
Straits Times - 18 Dec 2008
Labels:
Property
Tuesday, December 16
Philips Share Builders Plan
Posted by
Kay
at
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
16 comments
SBP which stands for Share Builders Plan, is a Dollar Cost Averaging or DCA in short, plan offered by Philips Securities. The whole idea behind the SBP is that you will contribute a fixed amount of funds every month and they will use that amount of funds that you have contributed to purchase shares on your behalf. Any remaining funds not used in the purchase of the shares will be carried over to the next month. Currently, there are 19 counters which are available for purchase under this SBP and the STI ETF is included in it too along with the other blue chips.
SBP which stands for Share Builders Plan, is a Dollar Cost Averaging or DCA in short, plan offered by Philips Securities. The whole idea behind the SBP is that you will contribute a fixed amount of funds every month and they will use that amount of funds that you have contributed to purchase shares on your behalf. Any remaining funds not used in the purchase of the shares will be carried over to the next month. Currently, there are 19 counters which are available for purchase under this SBP and the STI ETF is included in it too along with the other blue chips.
The brochure is rather easy to understand thus I would like to point out some other issues which you should take note if you are interested in the SBP.
1. Odd lot shares
Stocks in SGX are usually traded in board lot size. The board lot size is 1000 shares i.e. 1 lot = 1000 shares except for a few exceptions. For these exceptions, there will usually be a number in the name of the counter. For example, the size of 1 lot of SBS Transit 500 is 500 shares and the size of 1 lot of SIA 200 is 200 shares. There are two markets in SGX and they are the common market and the unit share market. If you wish to buy whole number of lots i.e. 1 lot, 2 lots, 3 lots, 4 lots etc, you can buy it on the common market and that is the market which most people will go to purchase stocks. However, if you wish to buy anything other than whole number of lots such as 200 shares of 800 shares which are also known as odd lots, you will have to buy it on the unit share market. Do take note that the unit share market is a totally different market from the common market. One potential problem that can arise is the lack of liquidity. A lack of liquidity will make it harder for you to buy and sell shares since there can be a lack of buyers and sellers for the shares. Furthermore, the difference in the buy price and the sell price can be rather significant and that can result in the purchase and sale of shares at an unfavourable price.
2. Custody of shares
Take note that the shares bought under the SBP is under the custody of Philips Securities and not CDP. If you check your CDP account, the shares which you have bought will not be reflected in there. When you wish to sell your shares, you will have to inform your trading representative before you can sell your shares. Do take note that if you inform your trading representative to sell your shares, you will be subjected to a minimum brokerage charges of $40 currently. If you wish to transfer your shares to CDP, you will have to pay $10.70 to CDP and $10.70 to Philips Securities for each counter that you wish to transfer.
3. Charges
The handling fee can be quite expensive if the amount of funds that you wish to use each month to buy shares is rather small. For example, $500 is set aside every month to purchase 2 counters. The handling fee for the purchase of 2 counters is $6.42 thus the handling fee in terms of percentage will be $6.42 / $500 * 100% = 1.28% and this is rather high. The percentage will be even higher if the amount of funds being set aside every month to buy shares is smaller than $500.
There are also other charges under the SBP. Even though the charges are quite small, they are still rather significant if added together. There are some charges you can avoid such as the Hard Copy Statement charge by opting for an Electronic Statement instead and Insuffcient Funds charge by ensuring sufficient funds in the designated bank account. Some charges are unavoidable such as the Dividend charge and Cash Offer, Rights Issue & Other Corporate Action charge.
4. Buying price of the shares
It is stated in the information sheet that the shares will be purchased on the 18th of every month on a non-discriminatory and non-preferential basis. If the 18th of every month falls on a trading day, the shares will be purchased on the next available trading day. In my opinion, there is a loophole with this. How can one determine whether the shares are purchased on a non-discriminatory and non-preferential basis ? There is always a possibility that they can purchase the shares at a lower price than what is being reflected to you and thus they can profit from the difference between the prices.
Despite of all the issues that I have mentioned regarding the SBP, it is still a rather useful plan. SBP enables the investor to develop some form of discipline by investing in a fixed amount of money every month. Furthermore, it also helps an investor by eliminating the problem of timing the market. Some of the blue chips such as DBS and Keppel Corp are very expensive to purchase since buying just one lot of these counters can cost a lot thus the SBP is a rather feasible plan that enables investors to own these counters by accumulating the odd lot shares over a period of of time.
I hope this post can prove to be useful for those who are interested in the SBP. Do think about it seriously as with any investments if you wish to take part in the SBP. If I have miss out on anything, feel free to leave comments and I will try my best to get back to you.
Labels:
Useful
Monday, December 15
Q3 jobless rate at 2.2%
Posted by
Kay
at
Monday, December 15, 2008
1 comment
The results for Q4 should be worse. Previously, the retrenchment mainly came from the banks and financial institutions. For the last month, it was the manufacturing companies such as Philips and Sony that were hogging the headlines for most of the retrenchment exercises and I expect there will be more companies retrenching people.
Dec 15, 2008
Q3 jobless rate at 2.2%
By Jeremy Au Yong
Singapore's economy fell into its first recession in six years as the global financial crisis reduced demand for Singapore's exports and factory output. -- BT FILE PHOTO
MORE than 35 people lost their jobs every day from July to September this year, a large jump from 21 a day in the three months before that.
The latest figures from the ministry show that 3,178 people here either got laid off or had their contracts ended prematurely in that period.
This is a 70 per cent spike compared to the 1,884 in the second quarter and marks the highest number of job losses since the last quarter of 2006.
Still, experts say the numbers represent just the tip of the retrenchment iceberg. Much worse news will likely come next year, and when fourth quarter results of this year are tallied.
The July to September figures, they say, do not fully capture the full impact of the fallout that started after investment bank Lehmann Brothers failed on Sept 15.
Already, every economic indicator listed in the ministry's report bore bad news.
As of September, the resident unemployment rate - which does not factor in foreigners - stood at 3.3 per cent. This is a slight increase over the 3.1 per cent in June.
Productivity also shrank, total employment growth slowed, the number of job vacancies dipped and recruitment rates fell.
One bright spark was the finding that service sectors firms as a whole are still likely to hire in the fourth quarter to deal with year-end festive season activities.
The results for Q4 should be worse. Previously, the retrenchment mainly came from the banks and financial institutions. For the last month, it was the manufacturing companies such as Philips and Sony that were hogging the headlines for most of the retrenchment exercises and I expect there will be more companies retrenching people.
Labels:
Jobs
STI Technical Analysis 15th Dec
Posted by
Kay
at
Monday, December 15, 2008
No comments
The volume for the past two trading days of the STI, which were down days were relatively light and that is a good sign. A gap was formed on 9th Dec at around 1683 and I am expecting STI to test this gap as a support level soon. If this testing is successful, there will be a good chance that STI will resume its move to the upside or will at least be consolidating.
The volume for the past two trading days of the STI, which were down days were relatively light and that is a good sign. A gap was formed on 9th Dec at around 1683 and I am expecting STI to test this gap as a support level soon. If this testing is successful, there will be a good chance that STI will resume its move to the upside or will at least be consolidating.
Labels:
STI,
Technical Analysis
Saturday, December 13
Lower Sibor attracts buyers
Posted by
Kay
at
Saturday, December 13, 2008
No comments
My perception is that Sibor is likely to remain low too into 2009. With the economy in recession, it is likely that the Fed will keep the rate low and thus this means that Sibor will remain low. Perhaps the Sibor will move up only after the economy has recover.
Dec 13, 2008
Lower Sibor attracts buyers
0.9% rate sees more interest but analysts warn of risks
By Gabriel Chen
INSTALMENTS for many home loan borrowers are set to fall after the all-important interest rate at which banks lend funds to one another nosedived to about 0.9 per cent this month.
Many home loan packages are pegged to this rate - known as the three-month Singapore Interbank Offered Rate (Sibor) - so when it goes down, so do Sibor- linked home loan instalments.
WHY SIBOR IS DOWN
There is widespread market expectation that the US Federal Reserve will cut its Fed funds target rate to 0.25 per cent from 1 per cent at its meeting next Tuesday. Sibor closely tracks this rate.
Continued measures by the Singapore authorities to pump liquidity into the system.
According to economists, the three-month Sibor should remain at these depressed levels into the new year.
OCBC Bank economist Selena Ling said the three-month Sibor is reacting to a couple of factors.
One is the widespread market expectation that the US Federal Reserve will cut its Fed funds target rate to 0.25 per cent from 1 per cent at its meeting on Tuesday.
The Sibor closely tracks this rate.
Another factor: continued measures by the Singapore authorities to pump liquidity into the system, against a backdrop of global and domestic recession.
In September, the three- month Sibor spiked to 2 per cent as the global credit crunch hit home here. Banks were afraid to lend to one another for fear of not getting repaid.
With the rate coming down sharply, more and more home buyers are looking at Sibor- linked loan packages.
Mr Geoffrey Ying, head of the mortgage division at financial advisory firm New Independent, estimates that six out of every 10 customers he is seeing are enquiring about Sibor-linked packages not only for high-end units, but also for HDB flats.
A year ago, when Sibor was significantly above 1 per cent, only three or four customers out of 10 would show interest.
It is easy to see why Sibor- linked packages have become the talk of the town, given the potential savings.
Suppose you want to buy an HDB flat. The best rate in the market is the 2.6 per cent annual rate for those qualifying for an HDB concessionary loan. This rate is pegged at a level 0.1 percentage point above the prevailing CPF ordinary account interest rate.
By comparison, at Standard Chartered Bank, for example, if you choose a two-year lock-in, its Sibor-linked package works out to Sibor plus a spread of - in this case - 0.95 per cent.
So if three-month Sibor stands at 0.9 per cent, you pay an annual rate of 1.85 per cent - lower than the HDB concessionary rate.
Still, financial experts say homebuyers must be careful. When Sibor falls, borrowers with a loan pegged to it gain as they will be paying a lower interest rate. But conversely, if the benchmark rate heads up, mortgage instalments also rise.
'We think though, that Sibor still has the potential to spike up, given that risks still remain out there,' a United Overseas Bank spokesman said.
Borrowers need to think carefully about choosing between two loan options, experts say.
Since January 2003, when banks were first allowed to provide loans for HDB flats, many homebuyers have opted for Sibor-linked packages as Sibor was very low, said Mr Leong Sze Hian, president of the Society of Financial Service Professionals.
In June 2003, the three-month Sibor bottomed out at 0.5625 per cent, but then surged to as high as 3.56 per cent three years later.
Mr Leong said that historically, the HDB rate of 2.6 per cent has been lower than rates for Sibor-linked packages.
More importantly, homebuyers with an HDB concessionary loan who switch to a bank loan cannot go back to the HDB if bank rates suddenly rise above the board's 2.6 per cent concessionary rate.
Experts think that banks are far more inclined than the HDB to repossess properties in the case of loan default.
'During the economic slowdown, there'll be people who'll struggle to meet monthly payments. Sure, Sibor- linked rates are low now, but if you want certainty, you'll choose HDB's,' said Mr Patrick Lim, associate director of financial advisory firm PromiseLand.
Take Mr David Lee, for instance. The 35-year-old engineer said that even though he is paying more now because he chose an HDB concessionary loan, he is not going to switch to a Sibor- linked package any time soon.
'I don't mind the slightly higher rate for peace of mind,' he said.
Mrs Ong-Ang Ai Boon, director of the Association of Banks in Singapore, is on record as saying that 'repossession would be a last resort, after all other measures have failed'.
gabrielc@sph.com.sg
My perception is that Sibor is likely to remain low too into 2009. With the economy in recession, it is likely that the Fed will keep the rate low and thus this means that Sibor will remain low. Perhaps the Sibor will move up only after the economy has recover.
Labels:
Sibor
Dollar Cost Averaging for STI ETF
Posted by
Kay
at
Saturday, December 13, 2008
7 comments
This post is part of a series of posts that discuss about the STI ETF in detail. To access the other posts in this series, click here
There are other methods of choosing when to buy the STI ETF. Dollar Cost Averaging or in short, DCA is one such method. DCA is the buying of the investment with a fixed amount of money at regular intervals. This method aims to eliminate the guesswork of knowing when to buy the investment and emotions such as the fear of buying the investment. However, the purchase of the STI ETF is slightly different from that of unit trusts. This is because one can only purchase the STI ETF in terms of the number of lots as it is traded over the stock exchange as compared to unit trust, where one can buy it at any amount. For example, if the STI ETF is trading at $2.00, one can only purchase in terms of the number of lots i.e. 1 lot, 2 lots, 3 lots and so on and the contract value will be $2000, $4000 and $6000 respectively.
So how should one go about implementing DCA ?
1) Decide and set aside a sum of money at every regular period for the purchase of the STI ETF. Make sure that you are financially capable of setting aside this amount of money as this plan requires consistency.
2) Decide on how long that period should be. Do take note that the period should not be too long apart as this will decrease the effectiveness of averaging the cost of the investment. A suggestion would be every 2 to 3 months although that will depend on how much money you are willing to set aside.
3) At every regular interval, use the amount of money that you have set aside to purchase the STI ETF. It will be advisable to choose a fixed date at every regular interval to carry out the purchase. For example, one can choose the 1st day of every month or the day which your pay is credited into your account.
For example, the period that I have choose will be a 3 months interval. Assuming I am willing to set aside $1500 per month for the purchase of the STI ETF, I will have $1500 * 3 = $4500 for each period.
1st period
Asumming that the STI ETF is trading at $1.70. Since I have $4500 to begin with, I can buy 2 lots of STI ETF at $3400. Assuming the commission cost $30, I would have spend a total of $3400 + $30 = $3430. Thus I will be left with $4500 - $3430 = $1070 which I will accumulate over to the next period.
2nd period
Assuming that the STI ETF is trading at $1.40. Since I have a total of $4500 + $1070 = $5570, I can buy 3 lots of STI ETF at $4200. Assuming the commission cost $30, I would have spend a total of $4200 + $30 = $4230. Thus I will be left with $5570 - $4230 = $1340 which I will accumulate over to the next period.
3rd period
Assuming that the STI ETF is trading at $2.50. Since I have a total of $4500 + $1340 = $5840, I can buy 2 lots of STI ETF at $5000. Assuming the commission cost $30, I would have spend a total of $5000 + $30 = $5030. Thus I will be left with $5840 - $5030 = $810 which I will accumulate over to the next period.
You would have bought a total of 2 + 3 + 3 = 7 lots using a total of $3400 + $4200 + $5000 = $12600. Thus the average purchase price for one lot of STI ETF will be $12600 / 7 = $1800.
In this way, you will be able to average out the purchase price of the STI ETF and reduce the risk of putting all your capital at the peak of the market. You will also be able to achieve a positive return for the STI ETF if you are willing to hold the STI ETF since the STI will rise in the long run.
Currently, there is a DCA plan being offered by a local brokerage. You can click here to see a review of it.
There are other methods of choosing when to buy the STI ETF. Dollar Cost Averaging or in short, DCA is one such method. DCA is the buying of the investment with a fixed amount of money at regular intervals. This method aims to eliminate the guesswork of knowing when to buy the investment and emotions such as the fear of buying the investment. However, the purchase of the STI ETF is slightly different from that of unit trusts. This is because one can only purchase the STI ETF in terms of the number of lots as it is traded over the stock exchange as compared to unit trust, where one can buy it at any amount. For example, if the STI ETF is trading at $2.00, one can only purchase in terms of the number of lots i.e. 1 lot, 2 lots, 3 lots and so on and the contract value will be $2000, $4000 and $6000 respectively.
So how should one go about implementing DCA ?
1) Decide and set aside a sum of money at every regular period for the purchase of the STI ETF. Make sure that you are financially capable of setting aside this amount of money as this plan requires consistency.
2) Decide on how long that period should be. Do take note that the period should not be too long apart as this will decrease the effectiveness of averaging the cost of the investment. A suggestion would be every 2 to 3 months although that will depend on how much money you are willing to set aside.
3) At every regular interval, use the amount of money that you have set aside to purchase the STI ETF. It will be advisable to choose a fixed date at every regular interval to carry out the purchase. For example, one can choose the 1st day of every month or the day which your pay is credited into your account.
For example, the period that I have choose will be a 3 months interval. Assuming I am willing to set aside $1500 per month for the purchase of the STI ETF, I will have $1500 * 3 = $4500 for each period.
1st period
Asumming that the STI ETF is trading at $1.70. Since I have $4500 to begin with, I can buy 2 lots of STI ETF at $3400. Assuming the commission cost $30, I would have spend a total of $3400 + $30 = $3430. Thus I will be left with $4500 - $3430 = $1070 which I will accumulate over to the next period.
2nd period
Assuming that the STI ETF is trading at $1.40. Since I have a total of $4500 + $1070 = $5570, I can buy 3 lots of STI ETF at $4200. Assuming the commission cost $30, I would have spend a total of $4200 + $30 = $4230. Thus I will be left with $5570 - $4230 = $1340 which I will accumulate over to the next period.
3rd period
Assuming that the STI ETF is trading at $2.50. Since I have a total of $4500 + $1340 = $5840, I can buy 2 lots of STI ETF at $5000. Assuming the commission cost $30, I would have spend a total of $5000 + $30 = $5030. Thus I will be left with $5840 - $5030 = $810 which I will accumulate over to the next period.
You would have bought a total of 2 + 3 + 3 = 7 lots using a total of $3400 + $4200 + $5000 = $12600. Thus the average purchase price for one lot of STI ETF will be $12600 / 7 = $1800.
In this way, you will be able to average out the purchase price of the STI ETF and reduce the risk of putting all your capital at the peak of the market. You will also be able to achieve a positive return for the STI ETF if you are willing to hold the STI ETF since the STI will rise in the long run.
Currently, there is a DCA plan being offered by a local brokerage. You can click here to see a review of it.
Labels:
STI ETF
Thursday, December 11
When to buy the STI ETF
Posted by
Kay
at
Thursday, December 11, 2008
2 comments
This post is part of a series of posts that discuss about the STI ETF in detail. To access the other posts in this series, click here
When is the correct time to buy the STI ETF ? This is an important question which we must ask ourselves. To demonstrate the importance of this question, let me ask a question. If you had bought the STI ETF on November 1999 at a level where the STI is around 2200 points, how long would it take to achieve a positive return ? In the picture below I have highlighted the period for which one bought the STI ETF on November 1999 with a green circle.
The answer to the previous question is 5 years and 3 months ! I have highlighted the period which the STI approaches the level of 2200 with a red circle. If you had bought near the peak of the STI, it will take you a very long time just to achieve a positive return. Moreover, if you had held on to the STI ETF which you had bought on November 1999 up to this present moment, you will be sitting on a paper loss since the current level of STI which I highlighted it with a blue circle is around 1700 and this is lower than your entry point of around 2200. Thus it is important to decide on when to buy the STI ETF.
Logically, one should choose to buy the STI ETF when the market is at its lowest level or when the market turns bearish. In this way, the STI ETF will be able to generate a positive return when the market recovers. However, this will prove to be difficult for the majority of the investing public to do so. This is because when the market is bearish, we would be surrounded with bad news such as economies going into recession, increasing unemployment rate, job retrenchment and so on. This will often induce fear and pessimism into the investing public and thus many will be afraid of buying at this point of time. You can click here to see a picture that describes the emotions experienced by the investing public in a humorous way. If one can overcome the fear of buying when the market is at its lowest level, he or she will certainly be able to achieve a good return on their investment.
When is the correct time to buy the STI ETF ? This is an important question which we must ask ourselves. To demonstrate the importance of this question, let me ask a question. If you had bought the STI ETF on November 1999 at a level where the STI is around 2200 points, how long would it take to achieve a positive return ? In the picture below I have highlighted the period for which one bought the STI ETF on November 1999 with a green circle.
The answer to the previous question is 5 years and 3 months ! I have highlighted the period which the STI approaches the level of 2200 with a red circle. If you had bought near the peak of the STI, it will take you a very long time just to achieve a positive return. Moreover, if you had held on to the STI ETF which you had bought on November 1999 up to this present moment, you will be sitting on a paper loss since the current level of STI which I highlighted it with a blue circle is around 1700 and this is lower than your entry point of around 2200. Thus it is important to decide on when to buy the STI ETF.
Logically, one should choose to buy the STI ETF when the market is at its lowest level or when the market turns bearish. In this way, the STI ETF will be able to generate a positive return when the market recovers. However, this will prove to be difficult for the majority of the investing public to do so. This is because when the market is bearish, we would be surrounded with bad news such as economies going into recession, increasing unemployment rate, job retrenchment and so on. This will often induce fear and pessimism into the investing public and thus many will be afraid of buying at this point of time. You can click here to see a picture that describes the emotions experienced by the investing public in a humorous way. If one can overcome the fear of buying when the market is at its lowest level, he or she will certainly be able to achieve a good return on their investment.
So are there any other ways of knowing when to buy into the STI ETF ? In my next post, I will discuss on how can one implement Dollar Cost Averaging or in short, DCA which is a method of buying in for the STI ETF.
Labels:
STI ETF
Unit Trust vs ETF
Posted by
Kay
at
Thursday, December 11, 2008
No comments
This article is taken from sgfunds.com and is written by Wilfred Ling. It gives a very well rounded view and a thorough look at the advantages and the disadvantages of both unit trust and ETF.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Unit Trust
Low sales charge for small investment. Large sales charge for big investment
The sales charge (or sometimes known as “front end load” or “commission”) for purchasing a Unit Trust is typically expressed as a fix percentage. For example, many equity Unit Trust have a sales charge of 2.5% while bonds tend to have a lower sales charge of 1.5%. Therefore, regardless of the amount of investment, the sales charge is always the same in percentage term. Therefore this permits you to invest in very small amount without paying exorbitant sales charge. Initial investment is often $1000 and subsequent is $500 and the sales charge is $25 and $12.5 respectively for 2.5% front end load. The sales charge in absolute amount is small when the investment amount is small. However, the sales charge in absolute dollar is large when the amount of investment is large. For example, if you invest $10,000 and assuming a 2.5% sales charge, the cost to you is $250.
Availability of Automatic Regular Saving Plans
Many distributors permit you to invest in Unit Trust regularly and in both small and large amounts. Better known as Regular Saving Plans (RSPs), such regular investment permits you to take advantage of dollar cost averaging. Many unit trust allow you to invest as low as $100 on a monthly basis. This is an advantage for those who could only accumulate surplus cash incrementally in small amount. Very often, new money comes in as we work. Thus the use of a regular saving plan is a discipline way of investing this new money as soon as it is available for investment.
Exact Investment Amount
When investing in Unit Trust, you know exactly how much you’ll be paying. If you invest in $1000, your payment to the distributors or bank is $1000 net. The same goes with RSPs. If you setup a GIRO to deduct $100 from your saving account to invest in a unit trust every month, an exact $100 will be deducted every month. No more and no less.
Purchase using different source of cash
Besides cash, you can purchase selected Unit Trust using CPF Ordinary Account, Special Account and Special Retirement Scheme (SRS).
Forward Pricing
Most Unit Trust employ forward pricing. By this it means that the day’s Net Asset Value (NAV) is only known in the future. This means that the unit price is unknown to both the investors and fund managers at the time of purchase. This implies that the number of units that you will receive is also not known at the point of purchase. However, the unit price and total units purchased are known a few days after the purchase.
Currency Risk and currency exchange cost
Depending on the investment mandate of a Unit Trust, the fund may invests in shares or bonds which its currencies are not in Singapore dollars. Therefore, those who invest in such Unit Trust will be expose to foreign exchange currency fluctuations that may result in loses (or gains) for the fund.
If the fund is not denominated in Singapore dollar, then any investment using Singapore dollar requires a conversation which also incurs a cost to the investor.
The worst case currency conversion cost occurs when the investor’s home based currency, the fund’s currency denomination and the currency of its underlying shares are all different from each other. For example, the Fidelity Korea fund is denominated in USD. A Singapore resident purchasing this Unit Trust is require to convert from SGD to USD. Cash received by the fund manager is then re-converted to Korean Won in order to purchase Korean stocks.
High annual expense. Costly foreign exchange. Costly cash.
One pitfall with Unit Trust is its high annual expense. Expenses like management fee, Trustee fees, performance fee, brokerage fees, GST, soft dollar commission are expenses charged to the fund and hence paid by the investors. In addition, if the currency held in cash by the fund manager is different from that of the securities he purchase or sell, a foreign currency exchange conversion cost is involved. Therefore, fund managers’ frequent trade may result in significant forex cost. It is typical for an equity fund’s turnover to exceed 100%. This means that shares purchased by the fund manager at the beginning of the year is unlikely to be held at the end of the year because it has already been sold. Such high turnover implies greater brokerage cost and high forex cost due to frequent foreign currency conversions.
Many funds hold significant amount of cash. Often spare cash is needed to meet redemption without the need to sell the fund’s securities. Sometime cash is needed as the fund manager anticipates significant investment opportunities. Other times, cash is held simply because there is no investment opportunity. Whatever the reasons, the presence of cash in a fund could be costly to the investor. As cash does not earn any return, it means this portion of the fund is not invested and hence cannot participate in any market upswing. Besides, management fee has already been paid to the fund manager to invest and not to hold cash (we can put our spare cash in fixed deposits with no management fee)
Dependence on fund manager’s skill. Fear of resignation
The performance of a Unit Trust is highly dependent on the fund manager’ skill. Such a fund relies on the manager’s market timing skill, ability to obtain information that is not available to others so as to enter and exit a particular investment faster then all other competing fund managers. Due to the high dependency on fund manager’s skill, any resignation is of concern. It is being said that if a fund house uses a team-based approach to manage its portfolio, it does not matter if a key staff leaves. However, if most of the team members leave, there goes all synergy that the team had build up over the years. Obviously for such a case, it will take the new team a long time to build up any synergy. Moreover, there is no guarantee that the new team will be as effective as the previous. As we know, this had happened to a fund house, which lost two thirds of its fixed income team and this had caused great distress to many investors.
Tax issues
According to IRAS, with effect from 1 Jan 2004, dividends from Unit Trust are not taxable (excluding distributions out of franked dividends or derived through partnership in Singapore). This is good news. However, this does not mean Unit Trust do not pay tax at all. As most securities are invested in foreign countries, there are tax liabilities paid to foreign governments and of course these are paid by the fund itself and have already been priced into the Net Asset Value (NAV), calculated on a daily basis.
Liquidity Risk
The underlying securities of a Unit Trust are bonds, shares or both. Fund managers face the same kind of liquidity risk as an investor that invests directly with these shares. In the event which the shares stop trading for some reason or are delisted, the fund house will write off these shares as having little or no value. Thus the NAV of the unit trust will drop due to this write off.
In the event of massive redemption by unit holders, cash holdings in the fund may not be sufficient to meet these redemptions. As a result, the fund manager will sell securities to raise cash. However, not all securities can be sold immediately as it depends on market liquidity. In order manage cash flow, many funds have a provision which allow the fund manager to provide partial redemptions spread across a few trading days rather then a lump sum redemption in a single day. What this means to you as an investor is that under market shock conditions, you may not be able to get out of the market fast enough. This is in contrast to holding shares directly, which you may be able to get out of the market faster.
Inferior performance
The most serious disadvantage of an Unit Trust is its poor performance when compared with its own benchmark. In the next few articles, we shall examine the performance of common Unit Trust in greater details.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Index Funds Exchange Trade Fund (ETF)
ETF are traded on the stock exchange like shares. However, the underlying securities of the ETF are basket of shares. ETF fund managers do not trade directly with retail investors. In fact, retail investors trade with fellow investors in the stock exchanges. Should there be a price discrepancy between share price and the Net Asset Value (NAV), institution investors may trade directly with the fund manager so as to use the price differential for a profit. Institution investors trade with the fund managers by using basket of shares in exchange for ETF share. They may also use ETF shares in exchange for the basket of shares. This will deplete or increase the number of ETF shares in the market place and thus influence the demand and supply of the ETF shares thereby narrowing the discrepancy between the ETF share price and the NAV. Due to this arbitrage mechanism, the share price of an ETF is normally very close to the NAV.
For the case of an index fund ETF, the underlying basket of shares are the same as those by its benchmark. An independent company normally decides the composition of the benchmark.
Good for large trade. Not good for small trade. Do not trade frequently
As an ETF is traded like share, any purchase or sales are subjected to a broker fee. Broker fees are normally expressed as a percentage subjected to a minimum charge. For example, lets assume a broker charges US$29 or 0.35% of trading principal whichever is larger. For a small amount of investment this will incur large broker fee. For a US$500 investment, the broker fee is 29/500 = 5.8%. However, for larger amount say US$2000, the broker fee becomes (29/2000 = ) 1.45% which is cheaper then Unit Trust. Of course for even larger amount, you could go down all the way to 0.35%. The larger you invest the cheaper the broker fee. Note that broker fee applies for both buy and sell. Therefore, it is not advisable to trade frequently.
Estimating the optimal amount to trade. Suitable for “buy and hold”
To better estimate the minimum amount of ETF shares you may buy without incurring exorbitant broker fee is to compare with an alternative Unit Trust. If a Unit Trust charges 2.5%, then purchasing an ETF is worth your money when the broker fee is less then 2.5%. Using the above example, if your investment is more then (US$29/(2.5%) = ) US$1160, your broker fee is less then 2.5%. Do remember that selling will also incur a similar broker fee and therefore ETF investing is suitable for those who employ a “buy and hold” philosophy.
Lack of RSP but Internet trading saves the day
Due to the manner which broker fees are structured, dollar cost averaging using small purchases cannot be done like Unit Trust without exorbitant broker fee. Still it is possible for you to employ dollar cost averaging by cumulating your surplus cash in a money market unit trust (normally 0% sales charge) until it reaches a sufficient amount to invest without exorbitant broker fee. However, the disadvantage in this method is that money not invested may lose an opportunity to participate in market upswing and therefore could be costly.
With the exception of Philips’ Share Builders Plan that can be use to purchase STI ETF and other selected shares regularly and automatically, no broker could arrange for an automated investment on ETF on a monthly basis. With the wide spread use of Internet share trading, purchase of any shares is just a matter of clicking a few buttons on the web browser and hence the lack of automated investment facility is not a significant deterrent.
Restricted source of cash for purchasing ETF
Unlike many Unit Trust, foreign listed ETF can only be purchased with cash. The local STI ETF can be purchased using cash, SRS and CPF Ordinary account.
Forex cost due to purchase/sales decreases with less frequent trades
If the ETF is denominated in US dollars, there is a forex cost when you purchase such shares using Singapore dollar currency. Similarly any sale of the share requires a conversation from US dollar back to Singapore dollar and hence this invoke another conversation cost. The forex cost is over and above the broker fee that is already paid. (No forex cost is incured if you are paying or redeeming in US dollars.) Frequent buy/sell trades increases additional forex cost. Therefore the less you trade, the less the forex cost of conversion.
Low expense. Little forex cost incured by the fund. Low/no brokerage fee paid by fund
The main attraction of index fund ETF is its low expense. It is being said that index funds are better then active managed unit trust because of its low expense. Active unit trust has such a high expense that on a long run, the erosion of its fund caused by its expenses becomes highly significant.
Unlike Unit Trust, there is little of forex cost incur by the fund itself because institution investors trade with the fund managers NOT with currency but through an electronic exchange of basket of shares certificates. Any forex cost due to the purchase of foreign shares by the institution investors are paid by them, not by the ETF funds. Similarly there is little brokerage fee charged to the fund because the ETF fund manager does not purchase or sell shares directly with the market.
Unlike Unit Trust counterpart, retail investors trade with fellow investors is independent of the fund manager. The fund manager does not interact with retail investors. Thus the frequent trades by retail investors do not increase the fund’s expenses. In addition, forex conversion cost is not propagated into the fund. This is unlike Unit Trust which multiple conversion cost is propagated to the fund if the Unit Trust’s currency denomination and the underlying shares’ currency are not the same.
Currency Risk (not the same as currency conversion cost)
Similar to the Unit Trust counterpart, investors are exposed to currencies fluctuation risk if the ETF’s underlying shares native currencies are not the same as investor’s own home based currency. Please note that there is a different between foreign exchange conversion cost (mentioned above) and currency risk. Investors are often confused between the two. In addition, any difference in currency between the home based currency and the ETF’s denominated currency is not an additional risk. For example, if an ETF is listed in US dollars but its underlying shares are denominated in Yen, then any depreciation of the US dollar against the Yen will result in an increase in the ETF NAV which is in US dollar assuming all things stay constant. If your home based currency is in Singapore dollar, your currency risk exposure is the SGD/YEN pair and has nothing to do with the US dollar.
But there is a cost involved when converting from your home based currency to the ETF’s denominated currency and vice versa and this happens when you make a purchase or sale.
Watch out for the custodial fees
Many broker impose a custodial fee for holding your foreign shares unless you trade often. Such custodial fees are normally charge as a per counter per month basis and could significantly erode your returns. Fortunately there is still one broker left that does not charge a custodial fee. Custodial fees can be reduced if you hold as few counters as possible. It is possible to construct a globally diversified equity portfolio just with 3 different ETF counters.
Note that Unit Trust does have a “custodial fee” through its annual management fee and expensive expenses.
Low dependence on fund manager. No fear in resignation. Benchmark returns
The fund manager’s duty is to ensure that its shares are of similar composition as its benchmark. Normally the shares composition of a benchmark is determined by an independent company. Therefore the management of the fund is administrative in nature and does not require the employment of top-notch and expensive managers. Due to this reason, there is little fear of any staff resignation. As its obligation is to maintain similar composition as its benchmark, any returns of the ETF will be similar to that of its benchmark.
Tax issues
30% of dividends derived from US listed ETF are taxed by the US government. There is no capital gain tax for non-US residents.
For Singapore’s side, similar to Unit Trust, resident individuals are not required to declare any foreign sourced income, including foreign sourced dividends, received in Singapore on or after 1 Jan 2004 as they are tax exempt. The tax exemption, however does not apply to foreign sourced income received through partnerships in Singapore.
Watch out for Price/NAV deviation
It is important to ensure that the share price of an ETF does not deviate too much from its NAV. Most index fund ETF share price does not deviate too far from its NAV but there are some that is persistently trading at a premium (when share price is above NAV) or at a discount (when share price is below NAV). Investors should avoid such ETF if the share price is persistently far from the NAV. Such a fund could indicate arbitrageurs’ difficulties in taking advantage of the price differential. These difficulties could be due to underlying shares’ liquidity problems.
Liquidity Risk and market shock
As ETF are traded like shares, it faces similar liquidity risk. An ETF that has low trading volume should be avoided since you will have to buy at a higher price or sell at a lower price in such a situation.
During market shock situation, it is possible for the share price of the ETF to deviate away from its NAV because arbitrageurs may face liquidity issues with its underlying securities and hence unable to quickly take advantage of the price differential situation.
Share Price known. No need to wait a few days later. Forex rate adds to excitement
One advantage for an ETF is that its share price is known during the entire market opening hours. This is unlike Unit Trust which its price is only calculated once a day and made known one or two days later (popularly known as “forward pricing”).
Like all shares, you can specify a maximum price which you are willing to buy when making your buy order for an ETF. Similarly you can specify the minimum price which you are willing to sell when making your sell order. However, as most ETF are denominated in US dollars and if you are paying in Singapore dollar, then the actual amount which you will be paying is also dependent on the foreign exchange rate at the time of transaction (which could occur hours or days after your order). This problem does not exist if the settlement currency is the same as that of the share or if your broker is able to freeze the exchange rate at the time of order.
Superior Performance
The most significant advantage of an index fund is its superior performance. Index Funds have superior performance primarily due to its low cost and secondly due to Unit Trusts' own poor performance. In the next few articles, we shall examine the returns of index funds more closely.
Conclusions
There are many advantages and disadvantages in investing in Unit Trust and Exchange Traded Funds. Depending on needs and constraints, Unit Trust may be more suitable for some and ETF may be more suitable for others.
Wilfred Ling is a freelance writer and is an active participant at http://www.sgfunds.com. He can be contacted at wilf_ling@yahoo.com. He is also an independent financial adviser and his website is http://www.wilfredling.com/
Advantages and Disadvantages of Unit Trust
Low sales charge for small investment. Large sales charge for big investment
The sales charge (or sometimes known as “front end load” or “commission”) for purchasing a Unit Trust is typically expressed as a fix percentage. For example, many equity Unit Trust have a sales charge of 2.5% while bonds tend to have a lower sales charge of 1.5%. Therefore, regardless of the amount of investment, the sales charge is always the same in percentage term. Therefore this permits you to invest in very small amount without paying exorbitant sales charge. Initial investment is often $1000 and subsequent is $500 and the sales charge is $25 and $12.5 respectively for 2.5% front end load. The sales charge in absolute amount is small when the investment amount is small. However, the sales charge in absolute dollar is large when the amount of investment is large. For example, if you invest $10,000 and assuming a 2.5% sales charge, the cost to you is $250.
Availability of Automatic Regular Saving Plans
Many distributors permit you to invest in Unit Trust regularly and in both small and large amounts. Better known as Regular Saving Plans (RSPs), such regular investment permits you to take advantage of dollar cost averaging. Many unit trust allow you to invest as low as $100 on a monthly basis. This is an advantage for those who could only accumulate surplus cash incrementally in small amount. Very often, new money comes in as we work. Thus the use of a regular saving plan is a discipline way of investing this new money as soon as it is available for investment.
Exact Investment Amount
When investing in Unit Trust, you know exactly how much you’ll be paying. If you invest in $1000, your payment to the distributors or bank is $1000 net. The same goes with RSPs. If you setup a GIRO to deduct $100 from your saving account to invest in a unit trust every month, an exact $100 will be deducted every month. No more and no less.
Purchase using different source of cash
Besides cash, you can purchase selected Unit Trust using CPF Ordinary Account, Special Account and Special Retirement Scheme (SRS).
Forward Pricing
Most Unit Trust employ forward pricing. By this it means that the day’s Net Asset Value (NAV) is only known in the future. This means that the unit price is unknown to both the investors and fund managers at the time of purchase. This implies that the number of units that you will receive is also not known at the point of purchase. However, the unit price and total units purchased are known a few days after the purchase.
Currency Risk and currency exchange cost
Depending on the investment mandate of a Unit Trust, the fund may invests in shares or bonds which its currencies are not in Singapore dollars. Therefore, those who invest in such Unit Trust will be expose to foreign exchange currency fluctuations that may result in loses (or gains) for the fund.
If the fund is not denominated in Singapore dollar, then any investment using Singapore dollar requires a conversation which also incurs a cost to the investor.
The worst case currency conversion cost occurs when the investor’s home based currency, the fund’s currency denomination and the currency of its underlying shares are all different from each other. For example, the Fidelity Korea fund is denominated in USD. A Singapore resident purchasing this Unit Trust is require to convert from SGD to USD. Cash received by the fund manager is then re-converted to Korean Won in order to purchase Korean stocks.
High annual expense. Costly foreign exchange. Costly cash.
One pitfall with Unit Trust is its high annual expense. Expenses like management fee, Trustee fees, performance fee, brokerage fees, GST, soft dollar commission are expenses charged to the fund and hence paid by the investors. In addition, if the currency held in cash by the fund manager is different from that of the securities he purchase or sell, a foreign currency exchange conversion cost is involved. Therefore, fund managers’ frequent trade may result in significant forex cost. It is typical for an equity fund’s turnover to exceed 100%. This means that shares purchased by the fund manager at the beginning of the year is unlikely to be held at the end of the year because it has already been sold. Such high turnover implies greater brokerage cost and high forex cost due to frequent foreign currency conversions.
Many funds hold significant amount of cash. Often spare cash is needed to meet redemption without the need to sell the fund’s securities. Sometime cash is needed as the fund manager anticipates significant investment opportunities. Other times, cash is held simply because there is no investment opportunity. Whatever the reasons, the presence of cash in a fund could be costly to the investor. As cash does not earn any return, it means this portion of the fund is not invested and hence cannot participate in any market upswing. Besides, management fee has already been paid to the fund manager to invest and not to hold cash (we can put our spare cash in fixed deposits with no management fee)
Dependence on fund manager’s skill. Fear of resignation
The performance of a Unit Trust is highly dependent on the fund manager’ skill. Such a fund relies on the manager’s market timing skill, ability to obtain information that is not available to others so as to enter and exit a particular investment faster then all other competing fund managers. Due to the high dependency on fund manager’s skill, any resignation is of concern. It is being said that if a fund house uses a team-based approach to manage its portfolio, it does not matter if a key staff leaves. However, if most of the team members leave, there goes all synergy that the team had build up over the years. Obviously for such a case, it will take the new team a long time to build up any synergy. Moreover, there is no guarantee that the new team will be as effective as the previous. As we know, this had happened to a fund house, which lost two thirds of its fixed income team and this had caused great distress to many investors.
Tax issues
According to IRAS, with effect from 1 Jan 2004, dividends from Unit Trust are not taxable (excluding distributions out of franked dividends or derived through partnership in Singapore). This is good news. However, this does not mean Unit Trust do not pay tax at all. As most securities are invested in foreign countries, there are tax liabilities paid to foreign governments and of course these are paid by the fund itself and have already been priced into the Net Asset Value (NAV), calculated on a daily basis.
Liquidity Risk
The underlying securities of a Unit Trust are bonds, shares or both. Fund managers face the same kind of liquidity risk as an investor that invests directly with these shares. In the event which the shares stop trading for some reason or are delisted, the fund house will write off these shares as having little or no value. Thus the NAV of the unit trust will drop due to this write off.
In the event of massive redemption by unit holders, cash holdings in the fund may not be sufficient to meet these redemptions. As a result, the fund manager will sell securities to raise cash. However, not all securities can be sold immediately as it depends on market liquidity. In order manage cash flow, many funds have a provision which allow the fund manager to provide partial redemptions spread across a few trading days rather then a lump sum redemption in a single day. What this means to you as an investor is that under market shock conditions, you may not be able to get out of the market fast enough. This is in contrast to holding shares directly, which you may be able to get out of the market faster.
Inferior performance
The most serious disadvantage of an Unit Trust is its poor performance when compared with its own benchmark. In the next few articles, we shall examine the performance of common Unit Trust in greater details.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Index Funds Exchange Trade Fund (ETF)
ETF are traded on the stock exchange like shares. However, the underlying securities of the ETF are basket of shares. ETF fund managers do not trade directly with retail investors. In fact, retail investors trade with fellow investors in the stock exchanges. Should there be a price discrepancy between share price and the Net Asset Value (NAV), institution investors may trade directly with the fund manager so as to use the price differential for a profit. Institution investors trade with the fund managers by using basket of shares in exchange for ETF share. They may also use ETF shares in exchange for the basket of shares. This will deplete or increase the number of ETF shares in the market place and thus influence the demand and supply of the ETF shares thereby narrowing the discrepancy between the ETF share price and the NAV. Due to this arbitrage mechanism, the share price of an ETF is normally very close to the NAV.
For the case of an index fund ETF, the underlying basket of shares are the same as those by its benchmark. An independent company normally decides the composition of the benchmark.
Good for large trade. Not good for small trade. Do not trade frequently
As an ETF is traded like share, any purchase or sales are subjected to a broker fee. Broker fees are normally expressed as a percentage subjected to a minimum charge. For example, lets assume a broker charges US$29 or 0.35% of trading principal whichever is larger. For a small amount of investment this will incur large broker fee. For a US$500 investment, the broker fee is 29/500 = 5.8%. However, for larger amount say US$2000, the broker fee becomes (29/2000 = ) 1.45% which is cheaper then Unit Trust. Of course for even larger amount, you could go down all the way to 0.35%. The larger you invest the cheaper the broker fee. Note that broker fee applies for both buy and sell. Therefore, it is not advisable to trade frequently.
Estimating the optimal amount to trade. Suitable for “buy and hold”
To better estimate the minimum amount of ETF shares you may buy without incurring exorbitant broker fee is to compare with an alternative Unit Trust. If a Unit Trust charges 2.5%, then purchasing an ETF is worth your money when the broker fee is less then 2.5%. Using the above example, if your investment is more then (US$29/(2.5%) = ) US$1160, your broker fee is less then 2.5%. Do remember that selling will also incur a similar broker fee and therefore ETF investing is suitable for those who employ a “buy and hold” philosophy.
Lack of RSP but Internet trading saves the day
Due to the manner which broker fees are structured, dollar cost averaging using small purchases cannot be done like Unit Trust without exorbitant broker fee. Still it is possible for you to employ dollar cost averaging by cumulating your surplus cash in a money market unit trust (normally 0% sales charge) until it reaches a sufficient amount to invest without exorbitant broker fee. However, the disadvantage in this method is that money not invested may lose an opportunity to participate in market upswing and therefore could be costly.
With the exception of Philips’ Share Builders Plan that can be use to purchase STI ETF and other selected shares regularly and automatically, no broker could arrange for an automated investment on ETF on a monthly basis. With the wide spread use of Internet share trading, purchase of any shares is just a matter of clicking a few buttons on the web browser and hence the lack of automated investment facility is not a significant deterrent.
Restricted source of cash for purchasing ETF
Unlike many Unit Trust, foreign listed ETF can only be purchased with cash. The local STI ETF can be purchased using cash, SRS and CPF Ordinary account.
Forex cost due to purchase/sales decreases with less frequent trades
If the ETF is denominated in US dollars, there is a forex cost when you purchase such shares using Singapore dollar currency. Similarly any sale of the share requires a conversation from US dollar back to Singapore dollar and hence this invoke another conversation cost. The forex cost is over and above the broker fee that is already paid. (No forex cost is incured if you are paying or redeeming in US dollars.) Frequent buy/sell trades increases additional forex cost. Therefore the less you trade, the less the forex cost of conversion.
Low expense. Little forex cost incured by the fund. Low/no brokerage fee paid by fund
The main attraction of index fund ETF is its low expense. It is being said that index funds are better then active managed unit trust because of its low expense. Active unit trust has such a high expense that on a long run, the erosion of its fund caused by its expenses becomes highly significant.
Unlike Unit Trust, there is little of forex cost incur by the fund itself because institution investors trade with the fund managers NOT with currency but through an electronic exchange of basket of shares certificates. Any forex cost due to the purchase of foreign shares by the institution investors are paid by them, not by the ETF funds. Similarly there is little brokerage fee charged to the fund because the ETF fund manager does not purchase or sell shares directly with the market.
Unlike Unit Trust counterpart, retail investors trade with fellow investors is independent of the fund manager. The fund manager does not interact with retail investors. Thus the frequent trades by retail investors do not increase the fund’s expenses. In addition, forex conversion cost is not propagated into the fund. This is unlike Unit Trust which multiple conversion cost is propagated to the fund if the Unit Trust’s currency denomination and the underlying shares’ currency are not the same.
Currency Risk (not the same as currency conversion cost)
Similar to the Unit Trust counterpart, investors are exposed to currencies fluctuation risk if the ETF’s underlying shares native currencies are not the same as investor’s own home based currency. Please note that there is a different between foreign exchange conversion cost (mentioned above) and currency risk. Investors are often confused between the two. In addition, any difference in currency between the home based currency and the ETF’s denominated currency is not an additional risk. For example, if an ETF is listed in US dollars but its underlying shares are denominated in Yen, then any depreciation of the US dollar against the Yen will result in an increase in the ETF NAV which is in US dollar assuming all things stay constant. If your home based currency is in Singapore dollar, your currency risk exposure is the SGD/YEN pair and has nothing to do with the US dollar.
But there is a cost involved when converting from your home based currency to the ETF’s denominated currency and vice versa and this happens when you make a purchase or sale.
Watch out for the custodial fees
Many broker impose a custodial fee for holding your foreign shares unless you trade often. Such custodial fees are normally charge as a per counter per month basis and could significantly erode your returns. Fortunately there is still one broker left that does not charge a custodial fee. Custodial fees can be reduced if you hold as few counters as possible. It is possible to construct a globally diversified equity portfolio just with 3 different ETF counters.
Note that Unit Trust does have a “custodial fee” through its annual management fee and expensive expenses.
Low dependence on fund manager. No fear in resignation. Benchmark returns
The fund manager’s duty is to ensure that its shares are of similar composition as its benchmark. Normally the shares composition of a benchmark is determined by an independent company. Therefore the management of the fund is administrative in nature and does not require the employment of top-notch and expensive managers. Due to this reason, there is little fear of any staff resignation. As its obligation is to maintain similar composition as its benchmark, any returns of the ETF will be similar to that of its benchmark.
Tax issues
30% of dividends derived from US listed ETF are taxed by the US government. There is no capital gain tax for non-US residents.
For Singapore’s side, similar to Unit Trust, resident individuals are not required to declare any foreign sourced income, including foreign sourced dividends, received in Singapore on or after 1 Jan 2004 as they are tax exempt. The tax exemption, however does not apply to foreign sourced income received through partnerships in Singapore.
Watch out for Price/NAV deviation
It is important to ensure that the share price of an ETF does not deviate too much from its NAV. Most index fund ETF share price does not deviate too far from its NAV but there are some that is persistently trading at a premium (when share price is above NAV) or at a discount (when share price is below NAV). Investors should avoid such ETF if the share price is persistently far from the NAV. Such a fund could indicate arbitrageurs’ difficulties in taking advantage of the price differential. These difficulties could be due to underlying shares’ liquidity problems.
Liquidity Risk and market shock
As ETF are traded like shares, it faces similar liquidity risk. An ETF that has low trading volume should be avoided since you will have to buy at a higher price or sell at a lower price in such a situation.
During market shock situation, it is possible for the share price of the ETF to deviate away from its NAV because arbitrageurs may face liquidity issues with its underlying securities and hence unable to quickly take advantage of the price differential situation.
Share Price known. No need to wait a few days later. Forex rate adds to excitement
One advantage for an ETF is that its share price is known during the entire market opening hours. This is unlike Unit Trust which its price is only calculated once a day and made known one or two days later (popularly known as “forward pricing”).
Like all shares, you can specify a maximum price which you are willing to buy when making your buy order for an ETF. Similarly you can specify the minimum price which you are willing to sell when making your sell order. However, as most ETF are denominated in US dollars and if you are paying in Singapore dollar, then the actual amount which you will be paying is also dependent on the foreign exchange rate at the time of transaction (which could occur hours or days after your order). This problem does not exist if the settlement currency is the same as that of the share or if your broker is able to freeze the exchange rate at the time of order.
Superior Performance
The most significant advantage of an index fund is its superior performance. Index Funds have superior performance primarily due to its low cost and secondly due to Unit Trusts' own poor performance. In the next few articles, we shall examine the returns of index funds more closely.
Conclusions
There are many advantages and disadvantages in investing in Unit Trust and Exchange Traded Funds. Depending on needs and constraints, Unit Trust may be more suitable for some and ETF may be more suitable for others.
Wilfred Ling is a freelance writer and is an active participant at http://www.sgfunds.com. He can be contacted at wilf_ling@yahoo.com. He is also an independent financial adviser and his website is http://www.wilfredling.com/
Labels:
Informational
Wednesday, December 10
Economists cut 2008 forecast to just 2.2%
Posted by
Kay
at
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
No comments
Private sector economists drastically cut 2008's growth forecast
By Rachel Kelly, Channel NewsAsia
SINGAPORE: The Singapore economy is expected to grow just 2.2 per cent this year, according to a central bank survey of private sector economists. This is nearly half the 4.2 per cent clip they predicted just three months ago.
The economists are also predicting a 1 per cent contraction for the economy – the first in eight years.
The turmoil in financial markets in October and November this year has triggered spillover effects on the global economy.
In the last survey in September by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), economists had thought the economy would grow around 4.2 per cent.
But with the collapse of US investment bank Lehman Brothers and financial problems at major Wall Street names, the outlook has become gloomier.
Market-watchers now expect the Singapore government to step in to buffer the slowdown.
Vishnu Varathan, regional economist, Forecast, said: "A very close watch factor would be how much of fiscal stimulus the government is aiming for the Singapore economy, and what form it will come in ... and what way it will be done."
Just a month ago, the government reduced its growth forecast for the economy to 2.5 per cent this year, down from an earlier estimate of 3 per cent. For next year, the survey showed that non-oil domestic exports will shrink 9 per cent.
Although economists said the construction sector is one sector due to see growth next year, they noted that this would not be enough to offset heavy falls in sectors such as manufacturing.
The key manufacturing sector is expected to contract 4.5 per cent. But the good news is that inflation will ease to around 1.7 per cent in 2009, compared with the expected 6.5 per cent this year.
Irvin Seah, economist, DBS Bank, said: "I think the fact that inflation is showing signs of easing is a very good for consumers, especially for the lower income group. High food prices would have squeezed their pockets."
On the labour front, the unemployment rate is expected to climb to 3.4 per cent next year.
Labels:
Economy
Tuesday, December 9
Safe investments preferred
Posted by
Kay
at
Tuesday, December 09, 2008
No comments
The results from the survey are interesting indeed. The main findings are that Singaporeans have a short investment horizon of around 3 to 5 years, close to half of them felt they do not have the information needed to make well-informed decisions on their personal finance and depend on word-of-mouth as a guide for making decisions regarding personal finance.
3 to 5 years is not a short investment horizon in my opinion, at least not in the conventional sense. Usually, an investment horizon which is long is around one to two decades. A investment horizon of 3 to 5 years is sufficient enough for anyone to achieve a good return on his capital by investing in a bear market and exiting when the market recovers or is near a peak.
One should find an independent financial adviser for guidance in making financial and investment decisions if he or she do not wish to spend time in reading and picking up relevant financial analysis skills instead of relying on word-of-mouth from people they know. It is the equivalent of asking your friend to construct a building when he or she is not trained in civil engineering. Perhaps, this can also explain on why are there so many people who choose to invest in structured products when the yield for such products are rather poor. The authorities should make an effort to protect the public from poor investment products when close to half of them do not possess enough knowledge to make sound financial decisions.
SINGAPOREANS are the second-most risk averse investors among 25 countries and territories covered by a new survey - preferring products yielding a safe or guaranteed return.
The annual Consumer Attitudes to Saving survey conducted by British insurer Aviva, which polled more than 28,500 investors worldwide, found Hong Kongers were the only investors more risk averse than Singaporeans.
Investors here and in Hong Kong also have short investment horizons, which could explain why structured products - with fixed returns over three to five years - had been so popular.
Yesterday, Mr Shaun Meadows, chief executive of Aviva in Singapore, Hong Kong and the Middle East, attributed the low-risk approach of investors here to their lack of financial confidence.
The survey found that more than half of the 1,000 Singaporeans polled, or 51 per cent, felt they do not have the information needed to make well-informed decisions on their personal finance.
And most typically turn to their family and friends for financial advice.
'Singaporeans feel poorly informed to make sound financial decisions, which might have led to a prevalent risk averse mindset,' said Mr Meadows.
Word-of-mouth is an important factor in helping guide decisions, with close to half of the respondents saying that recommendations by friends, family and colleagues who save or invest with the firm is most important when choosing a financial services provider.
Nearly seven out of 10 respondents here would recommend a financial services firm or product they like.
The survey was conducted early this year, before the outcry over failed investment products linked to collapsed US investment bank Lehman Brothers.
Mr Meadows said the controversy would likely reinforce investors' distrust of financial institutions.
He added that the current difficulties in the financial markets have not helped to build consumer confidence over where they can get reliable information.
The survey also found that Singaporeans have among the shortest time horizons for investments, behind Hong Kong and mainland China, with 66 per cent of respondents saying their preferred financial time scale was within the next five years.
The lack of affordability was cited by respondents as the biggest barrier to saving and investing more money. This is followed by the risk of losing savings or investments, low interest rates or potential growth and lack of good advice.
Now in its fifth year, the report also identified gaps in Singaporeans' retirement planning, reinforcing the need to better inform and help people save and invest for their retirement.
On a positive note, more than two-thirds of respondents here, or 68 per cent, are taking steps now to ensure that they have an adequate level of income for retirement. Still, 61 per cent are worried that they will not have enough money set aside for their golden years.
Generally, Singaporeans are open to working past the age of 62.
Investors here are second to Hong Kongers in wanting to work after retirement age. More than six out of 10 Singapore respondents, or 62 per cent, would like to work, either full time or part time, after the usual retirement age.
'All these clearly highlight the need for financial services firms to inform Singaporeans to raise levels of retirement planning to reduce anxiety about the lack of financial knowledge and insufficient levels of saving,' Mr Meadows pointed out.
This article was first published in The Straits Times on December 4, 2008.
The results from the survey are interesting indeed. The main findings are that Singaporeans have a short investment horizon of around 3 to 5 years, close to half of them felt they do not have the information needed to make well-informed decisions on their personal finance and depend on word-of-mouth as a guide for making decisions regarding personal finance.
3 to 5 years is not a short investment horizon in my opinion, at least not in the conventional sense. Usually, an investment horizon which is long is around one to two decades. A investment horizon of 3 to 5 years is sufficient enough for anyone to achieve a good return on his capital by investing in a bear market and exiting when the market recovers or is near a peak.
One should find an independent financial adviser for guidance in making financial and investment decisions if he or she do not wish to spend time in reading and picking up relevant financial analysis skills instead of relying on word-of-mouth from people they know. It is the equivalent of asking your friend to construct a building when he or she is not trained in civil engineering. Perhaps, this can also explain on why are there so many people who choose to invest in structured products when the yield for such products are rather poor. The authorities should make an effort to protect the public from poor investment products when close to half of them do not possess enough knowledge to make sound financial decisions.
Monday, December 8
STI ETF vs Unit Trust
Posted by
Kay
at
Monday, December 08, 2008
7 comments
This post is part of a series of posts that discuss about the STI ETF in detail. To access the other posts in this series, click here
So what are the differences between the STI ETF and unit trust ? What are the advantages and disadvantages of investing in STI ETF over unit trust ? Both have their advantages and disadvantages but there is one crucial area which makes the STI ETF a more attractive form of investment as compared to unit trust.
1.Sales charge
Sales charge or sales load is the amount of fees that you have to pay for the purchase of the investment. In general, the sales charge for unit trusts that deal in equities is around 2.5%. The equivalent of sales charge for the STI ETF is the brokerage fees. This is because the STI ETF is traded over the stock exchange, thus we will have to pay the brokerage firm to help us purchase the STI ETF over the stock exchange in order to purchase the STI ETF. In addition to the brokerage fees, there are also other fees associated with the brokerage fees and they are listed below.
Brokerage fee: Around 0.25% to 0.275% or a minimum of around $25 depending on which brokerage firm and the value of the contract
Clearing fee: 0.04% on contract value
SGX Trading fee: 0.0075% on contract value
GST: 7.0% on each above item
Contract value refers to the amount of stocks that you have bought. For example, if you bought 5 lots of STI ETF at $2.00, the contract value will be 5 lots * 1000 * $2.00 = $10,000. Do take note that 1 lot is the equivalent of 1000 shares thus we will need to multiply the 5 lots by 1000 in order to get the total number of shares
The total fees for purchasing the STI ETF will be around 0.3%. Do take note that if you wish to sell the STI ETF, you will need to pay the brokerage fees again.
Regardless of any investment amounts, the sales charge for purchasing the unit trust is always fixed at around 2.5% depending on which unit trust while the brokerage fees for purchasing the STI ETF is around 0.25% to 0.275% or a minimum of around $25 depending on the brokerage and the contract value. Thus if the contract value is too small, it may be more expensive to purchase the STI ETF due to the minimum brokerage fee of around $25. Otherwise, the fees required to purchase the STI ETF is lower than than of unit trusts.
2.Annual Expense
In general, unit trusts have an annual expense ranging from 1% to 1.5% while the STI ETF have an annual expense of 0.3% currently thus the annual expense of the STI ETF is much lower than that of unit trusts. This is because the fund manager of unit trusts have to play an active role in managing the unit trust such as the purchase and sale of stocks in the portfolio. Other expenses include the fees being paid to the management and the trustee. In contrast, the fund manager of the STI ETF only needs to play a passive role in managing the STI ETF by maintaining the stocks that constitute the index and making sure that the STI ETF tracks the index.
3.Returns in the long run
The crucial difference between the STI ETF and unit trusts lies here. STI ETF has a higher probability of generating better returns as compared to other forms of investment in the long run. We can take a look at a study that compares the returns offered by ETFs and unit trusts in general.
Vanguard 500 Index Fund is a fund which tracks the S&P 500 index for the US market. Index funds are basically the same as ETF as both tracks the index except that it is not traded on the stock exchange. A study was done to show the returns of the Vanguard 500 Index Fund as compared to unit trust or mutual funds.
Looking back from Dec 31, 2002, how many US stocks funds outperformed Vanguard 500 Index Fund?
One year:
1186 of 2423 funds (or 48.9%)
Three years:
1157 of 1944 funds (or 59.5%)
Five years:
768 of 1494 funds (or 51.4%)
Ten years:
227 of 728 funds (or 31.2%)
Fifteen years:
125 of 445 funds(or 28.1%)
Twenty years:
37 of 248 funds(or 14.9%)
Taken from Lipper Inc.
As you can see from the results, the longer the time frame used to compare the returns between ETF and unit trust, the lesser the probability of a unit trust beating a ETF. In short, it is highly probable that the STI ETF is able to outperform unit trusts in the long run.
In conclusion, STI ETF will be a better form of investment over unit trusts in the long run simply due to the higher chances of achieving a better return. I will be touching on how should one go about buying the STI ETF in my subsequent posts.
So what are the differences between the STI ETF and unit trust ? What are the advantages and disadvantages of investing in STI ETF over unit trust ? Both have their advantages and disadvantages but there is one crucial area which makes the STI ETF a more attractive form of investment as compared to unit trust.
1.Sales charge
Sales charge or sales load is the amount of fees that you have to pay for the purchase of the investment. In general, the sales charge for unit trusts that deal in equities is around 2.5%. The equivalent of sales charge for the STI ETF is the brokerage fees. This is because the STI ETF is traded over the stock exchange, thus we will have to pay the brokerage firm to help us purchase the STI ETF over the stock exchange in order to purchase the STI ETF. In addition to the brokerage fees, there are also other fees associated with the brokerage fees and they are listed below.
Brokerage fee: Around 0.25% to 0.275% or a minimum of around $25 depending on which brokerage firm and the value of the contract
Clearing fee: 0.04% on contract value
SGX Trading fee: 0.0075% on contract value
GST: 7.0% on each above item
Contract value refers to the amount of stocks that you have bought. For example, if you bought 5 lots of STI ETF at $2.00, the contract value will be 5 lots * 1000 * $2.00 = $10,000. Do take note that 1 lot is the equivalent of 1000 shares thus we will need to multiply the 5 lots by 1000 in order to get the total number of shares
The total fees for purchasing the STI ETF will be around 0.3%. Do take note that if you wish to sell the STI ETF, you will need to pay the brokerage fees again.
Regardless of any investment amounts, the sales charge for purchasing the unit trust is always fixed at around 2.5% depending on which unit trust while the brokerage fees for purchasing the STI ETF is around 0.25% to 0.275% or a minimum of around $25 depending on the brokerage and the contract value. Thus if the contract value is too small, it may be more expensive to purchase the STI ETF due to the minimum brokerage fee of around $25. Otherwise, the fees required to purchase the STI ETF is lower than than of unit trusts.
2.Annual Expense
In general, unit trusts have an annual expense ranging from 1% to 1.5% while the STI ETF have an annual expense of 0.3% currently thus the annual expense of the STI ETF is much lower than that of unit trusts. This is because the fund manager of unit trusts have to play an active role in managing the unit trust such as the purchase and sale of stocks in the portfolio. Other expenses include the fees being paid to the management and the trustee. In contrast, the fund manager of the STI ETF only needs to play a passive role in managing the STI ETF by maintaining the stocks that constitute the index and making sure that the STI ETF tracks the index.
3.Returns in the long run
The crucial difference between the STI ETF and unit trusts lies here. STI ETF has a higher probability of generating better returns as compared to other forms of investment in the long run. We can take a look at a study that compares the returns offered by ETFs and unit trusts in general.
Vanguard 500 Index Fund is a fund which tracks the S&P 500 index for the US market. Index funds are basically the same as ETF as both tracks the index except that it is not traded on the stock exchange. A study was done to show the returns of the Vanguard 500 Index Fund as compared to unit trust or mutual funds.
Looking back from Dec 31, 2002, how many US stocks funds outperformed Vanguard 500 Index Fund?
One year:
1186 of 2423 funds (or 48.9%)
Three years:
1157 of 1944 funds (or 59.5%)
Five years:
768 of 1494 funds (or 51.4%)
Ten years:
227 of 728 funds (or 31.2%)
Fifteen years:
125 of 445 funds(or 28.1%)
Twenty years:
37 of 248 funds(or 14.9%)
Taken from Lipper Inc.
As you can see from the results, the longer the time frame used to compare the returns between ETF and unit trust, the lesser the probability of a unit trust beating a ETF. In short, it is highly probable that the STI ETF is able to outperform unit trusts in the long run.
In conclusion, STI ETF will be a better form of investment over unit trusts in the long run simply due to the higher chances of achieving a better return. I will be touching on how should one go about buying the STI ETF in my subsequent posts.
Labels:
STI ETF
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)